Back

Comparisons of Tree Damage Indicators in Five NASA ABoVE Forest Sites Near Fairbanks, Alaska

Huebner, D. C.; Potter, C. S.

2024-07-16 ecology
10.1101/2024.07.10.602861 bioRxiv
Show abstract

As global warming affects sensitive northern regions, forests near Fairbanks, Alaska may be undergoing attack from pests and pathogens that could impact their ability to store carbon. Visual tree surveys are quick and useful for assessing forest health in remote sensing studies using GT (ground-truthing). Initial spectral analysis of leaf pigments, canopy water content, and non-photosynthetic carbon of one site near Fairbanks, Alaska imaged with AVIRIS-NG by NASA for the Arctic and Boreal Vulnerability Experiment (ABoVE) showed high fire fuel loads in 2017 that burned in 2019. In 2021-2022 we visually assayed damage of 359 deciduous and 309 coniferous trees at five ABoVE sites of different moisture regimes and burn severities. Using indices of 0 - 5 (0 = healthy, 5 = severe damage) we calculated average damage per tree from: 1) leaf damage (holes or defoliation); 2) stem damage (changes in stem color, texture, growth, heartwood, sap ooze, or stem loss); 3) non-photosynthetic tissue, aka "browning"; and 4) wilting. We also characterized crown color tree-1. Least squares models found low overall average tree damage, but damage types were varied and complex. Deciduous trees suffered greater herbivore damage than conifers. A third of trees showed broadleaf insect damage, a tenth of trees across species showed stem damage associated with pathogens. Aspen and conifers showed heartwood rot, but we found no visual signs of spruce beetle at our sites. Structural equation models found greater stem damage and wilting in warmer soils and post-burned sites supporting seedlings. Browning was associated with understory branches of conifers in late-successional sites with colder, shallower soils. Our study suggests that deciduous trees and seedlings near Fairbanks, Alaska are experiencing herbivory and midsummer wilting, and conifer understory browning is common.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
45.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
4
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
5
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
6
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
8
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
9
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
11
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
13
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.3%
16
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
19
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Tree Physiology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
24
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%