Back

Deep learning linking mechanistic models to single-cell transcriptomics data reveals transcriptional bursting in response to DNA damage

Huang, Z.; Luo, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, B.; Nie, Q.; Zhang, J.

2024-07-12 systems biology
10.1101/2024.07.10.602845 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cells must adopt flexible regulatory strategies to make decisions regarding their fate, including differentiation, apoptosis, or survival in the face of various external stimuli. One key cellular strategy that enables these functions is stochastic gene expression programs. However, understanding how transcriptional bursting, and consequently, cell fate, responds to DNA damage on a genome-wide scale poses a challenge. In this study, we propose an interpretable and scalable inference framework, DeepTX, that leverages deep learning methods to connect mechanistic models and scRNA-seq data, thereby revealing genome-wide transcriptional burst kinetics. This framework enables rapid and accurate solutions to transcription models and the inference of transcriptional burst kinetics from scRNA-seq data. Applying this framework to several scRNA-seq datasets of DNA-damaging drug treatments, we observed that fluctuations in transcriptional bursting induced by different drugs was associated with distinct fate decisions: IdU treatment was associated with differentiation in mouse embryonic stem cells by increasing the burst size of gene expression, while low- and high-dose 5FU treatments in human colon cancer cells were associated with changes in burst frequency that corresponded to apoptosis- and survival-related fate, respectively. Together, these results show that DeepTX enables genome-wide inference of transcriptional bursting from single-cell transcriptomics data and can generate hypotheses about how bursting dynamics relate to cell fate decisions.

Published in eLife (predicted rank #6) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.