Back

Transient Naive Treatment (TNT) iPS cells do not feature Sendai virus expression: Response to Sendai virus persistence questions the transient naive reprogramming method for iPSC generation

Buckberry, S.; Liu, X.; Poppe, D.; Tan, J. P.; Faulkner, G. J.; Polo, J. M.; Lister, R.

2024-07-11 developmental biology
10.1101/2024.07.10.602807 bioRxiv
Show abstract

SummaryThe Transient Naive Treatment (TNT) reprogramming method involves a brief period of culturing in naive media early in the reprogramming process. Through conducting extensive molecular, epigenetic, and functional analyses on numerous induced pluripotent stem cell lines, we have demonstrated that TNT reprogramming facilitates epigenetic memory erasure and produces induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells more similar to embryonic stem (ES) cells than conventional reprogramming methods1. In 2024, De Los Angeles et al. posted a contradictory results preprint on bioRxiv titled Sendai virus persistence questions the transient naive reprogramming method for iPSC generation2. Their claims include: 1) that Sendai virus expression in naive cultured cells questions the TNT reprogramming method, 2) the possible selection of cells (clonal expansion) with Sendai virus expression during TNT reprogramming, 3) Sendai virus genes being expressed in control samples implying a potential sample mix-up. Here, we demonstrate these claims are not directly supported by the data, and emphasize that we assessed the possibility of cell sub-population selection experimentally in Buckberry et al. (2023). Moreover, our re-analyses of the data in the context of Sendai virus expression during reprogramming actually highlight the advantages of TNT reprogramming concerning the timing of the naive media treatment and the absence of detectable Sendai virus gene expression.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.8%
2
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
Stem Cell Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
4
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
5
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
7
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
10
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.3%
13
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.0%
15
RNA Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
16
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
17
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
Molecular Biology Reports
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
21
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
23
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
28
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
29
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%