Back

Clinical implication of time of stroke among post stroke survivors from eastern India: A circadian perspective

Sadhukhan, D.; Roy, A.; Banerjee, T. K.; Krishnan, P.; Moitra, P. S.; Mukherjee, J.; Ghosh, K. C.; Hui, S. P.; BISWAS, A.

2024-07-10 neurology
10.1101/2024.07.10.24310104 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe circadian variation in stroke occurrence is a well-documented phenomenon. However, the circadian effect on stroke outcome, particularly on post-stroke cognition, is not yet been fully elucidated. Aims and objectiveWe aim to evaluate the influence of diurnal variation of stroke onset upon post-stroke cognition and development of post-stroke depression. Materials and MethodsBased on 4-hourly time period of stroke occurrence, 249 recruited cohorts were categorized into 6 groups. Several clinical and cognitive parameters were compared among the groups. Then, the mRNA expression of core clock genes in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells were quantified and correlated with post stroke outcome among 24 acute phase cases with day-time or night-time stroke occurrence. Furthermore, the genetic susceptibility towards higher number of cases in morning were examined by genotyping CLOCK (rs1801260T/C, rs4580704G/C) and CRY2 (rs2292912C/G) genes variants in cases and 292 controls. Results and conclusionAmong the six subgroups, the subgroup-1 represents the nocturnal-onset stroke cases; they were identified to have higher NIHSS score (12.2{+/-}5.67) at the time of admission than other subgroups (8.73{+/-}5.92). In the same cohort, more number of diabetic individuals with higher fasting blood sugar level (186.57{+/-}93.40) was also observed. After 6 months, those with nocturnal-onset stroke had higher prevalence of language impairment and depression score. A significant decrease in mRNA level of BMAL1 and CRY1 genes correlated with raw score for language and depression; data in nocturnal onset cases further established our observation. However, the higher incidence of stroke in day time did not reveal any genetic correlation.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.5%
2
Life Sciences
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.8%
5
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
7
Molecular Neurobiology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
8
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
BioMed Research International
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
10
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
11
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
13
Gene
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
14
Health Science Reports
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
16
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
Antioxidants
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Journal of Biomedical Science
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
22
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
24
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
25
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
26
npj Aging
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
27
Journal of Global Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
28
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%