Back

Legacy effects of extreme events

Brueggemeier-Singh, D.; Vos, M.

2024-07-13 ecology
10.1101/2024.07.09.602699 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Global change is increasing the intensity of environmental extremes. Abiotic extremes include hotter summers and more intense heatwaves1-2. Biotic extremes include disproportionate increases in herbivory3. Both have well-understood immediate impacts on the plant communities that support life across the globe. However, their longterm effects are difficult to predict, as it is unknown how heat and herbivory differ in the way they create historical legacies. These are changes in a community that still affect dynamics and recovery long after a disturbance has passed. Here we show differences in legacy construction by mild and extreme heatwaves and small- and large-bodied herbivores. We analysed patterns in the population dynamics of a consumer added to replicated primary producer communities after disturbance had ended. We find that the legacy induced by extreme heat drives post-disturbance consumer declines in all replicates. This results in stochastic extinctions as the loss of populations becomes more likely when their density gets close to zero. In contrast, the legacy created by the large-bodied herbivore does not drive extinctions. It diminishes population growth by orders of magnitude across six generations. The observed effects appear after a time-lag that is shorter for extreme heat than for herbivory. Our results show that legacy effects drive complex causal sequences that may involve deterministic and chance components, time-lags, stressor amplification and regime shifts. Insight in how these combine to shape the future is essential for our capacity to accurately forecast and repair the consequences of global change.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.