Identification of whole-body reaching movement phenotypes in young and older active adults: an unsupervised machine learning approach
PFAFF, M.; CASTERAN, M.
Show abstract
Studies reported age-related motor control modifications in whole-body movement in several aspects of spatiotemporal movement organization by comparing young and older adults. However, studies on motor control involve high complexity and high-dimensional data of different natures, in which machine learning has proved to be effective. Furthermore, conventional studies focus on comparisons of movement parameters based on a priori grouping, whereas unsupervised machine learning allows the identification of inherent groupings within the dataset. The current investigation was carried out by using the unsupervised machine learning on motor control features across age-groups. An important question was whether we could identify different movement patterns based on motor control features and whether they were age-dependent or independent. We investigated motor control parameters variations in a whole-body reaching movement across young and active older adults including woman and man (n=19). We applied the K-means clustering algorithm to segment the kinematic data (21 features) of all individuals. We propose a methodology applying the latest recommendations for clustering methods in the field of whole-body movement motor control. Analysis revealed two distinct motor control patterns which were age independent. The first pattern exhibited higher shoulder, ankle and knee angular excursions, along with a higher vertical velocity of center of mass (CoM), compared to the second pattern, which had higher hip and back angular excursions, along with a lower vertical velocity CoM. The clustering methodology demonstrated its effectiveness to identify distinct motor patterns based solely on motor control features independently of age-grouping. Significance StatementO_LIK-means clustering algorithm enabled us to identify two distinct age-independent motor patterns: a first pattern with high shoulder, ankle and knee angular excursions, and vertical velocity of CoM; a second pattern with high hip and back angular excursions and low vertical velocity of CoM. C_LIO_LIDemonstrates how unsupervised machine learning can identify motor patterns and proposes a methodology to apply it in the field of whole-body movement motor control. C_LIO_LIProves the complementary contribution of unsupervised machine learning to conventional approach for motor control studies, which enables to process the high complexity and dimensionality of movements. C_LIO_LIAdvances understanding of motor behaviours through unsupervised machine learning analysis of whole-body reaching movements. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel methodology for assessing total recovery time in response to unexpected perturbations while walking 96%
- Effects of additional load at different heights on gait initiation: a statistical parametric mapping of center of pressure and center of mass behavior 96%
- Effect of sampling frequency on fractal fluctuations during treadmill walking 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a smartphone embedded inertial measurement unit for measuring postural stability in older adults 95%
- The effects of pressure on anticipatory postural adjustments during a jump shot in basketball 95%
- Slow walking synergies reveal a functional role for arm swing asymmetry in healthy adults: a principal component analysis with relation to mechanical work. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Muscle activity of cutting manoeuvres and soccer inside passing suggests an increased groin injury risk during these movements 95%
- Quantifying mechanical loading and elastic strain energy of the human Achilles tendon during walking and running 94%
- The Ramp protocol: Uncovering individual differences in walking to an auditory beat using TeensyStep 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validity and reliability of Kinect v2 for quantifying upper body kinematics during seated reaching 95%
- Using a Motion Sensor to Categorize Low Back Pain Patients: A Machine Learning Approach 94%
- Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units in active range of motion assessment in the hip joint 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.