Back

Altered cortico-cerebellar connectivity in cerebellar degeneration patients improves with motor training

Nettekoven, C.; Draganova, R.; Steiner, K. M.; Goericke, S. L.; Deistung, A.; Konczak, J.; Timmann, D.

2024-07-06 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.07.05.602300 bioRxiv
Show abstract

People with cerebellar degeneration show characteristic ataxic motor impairments. Despite cerebellar dysfunction, they can still improve motor performance through sensorimotor training. Yet, how such training affects functional brain networks affected by cerebellar degeneration is unknown. We here investigated neuroplastic changes in the cortico-cerebellar network after a five-day forearm movement training in 40 patients with mild to severe cerebellar degeneration and 40 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Participants were assigned to one of four motor training conditions, varying online visual feedback and explicit verbal feedback. Anatomical and resting-state fMRI was collected on the days before and after training. To overcome the limitations of standard brain templates that fail in the presence of severe anatomical abnormalities, we developed a specific template for comparing cerebellar patients with age-matched controls. Our new template reduced the spatial spread of cerebellar anatomical landmarks by 30% relative to existing templates and tripled fMRI noise classification accuracy. Using this pipeline, we found that patients showed impaired connectivity between cerebellar motor regions and neocortical visuomotor and premotor regions at baseline compared to controls, whereas their cortico-cortical connectivity remained intact. Training with vision strengthened connectivity in the cortico-cerebellar visuomotor network contralateral to the trained arm in all participants. Cerebellar patients exhibited additional increased connectivity ipsilateral to the training arm in this network. Further, training with explicit verbal feedback facilitated connectivity between a cerebellar cognitive region and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. These results indicate that motor training in cerebellar degeneration leads to enhanced functional connectivity of the cortico-cerebellar network.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.3%
2
The Cerebellum
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
3
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
4
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.0%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 23%
5.3%
6
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.3%
7
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.2%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.9%
12
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
13
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
14
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
15
Brain Structure and Function
93 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
16
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
17
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.6%
18
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
19
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.0%
22
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
89 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
Neurotherapeutics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%