Eyes robustly blink to musical beats like tapping
Wu, Y.; Teng, X.; Du, Y.
Show abstract
Auditory-motor synchronization with musical rhythm may extend beyond overt body movements like fingers or feet. Through four experiments combining eye-tracking, neurophysiological and structural imaging approaches with 123 young non-musicians, we demonstrated robust synchronization of spontaneous eye blinks with musical beats. The blinking rate consistently aligned with the beat rate across various tempi and independent of melodic cues. Blinking exhibited beat phase-specific tuning, with inhibition immediately before beats and increased frequency afterward. Variations in blink-beat synchronization corresponded to the difference in microstructural lateralization of auditory-parietal connectivity. EEG recordings revealed a dynamic correspondence between blink and neural beat tracking. Mechanistically, this synchronization reflects dynamic auditory attention and temporal modulation of visual sampling. Our findings establish eye tapping as a novel behavioral paradigm, expanding the behavioral repertoire of auditory-motor synchronization. It underscores the intricate relationship between music rhythms and peripheral oculomotor system, proposing a cross-modal active sensing and embodied experience in music perception.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of musical expertise on disentangled and contextual neural encoding of music revealed by generative music models 96%
- Attention to rhythms: sensory-specific constrained sampling of temporal regularities 95%
- Spectro-temporal acoustical markers differentiate speech from song across cultures 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptual awareness of near-threshold tones scales gradually with auditory cortex activity and pupil dilation 94%
- Temporal-Coherence Induces Binding in Responses to Sound Sequences in Ferret Auditory Cortex 94%
- Internal selective attention is delayed by competition between endogenous and exogenous factors. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.