Back

Regeneration recapitulates many embryonic processes, including reuse of developmental regulatory regions

Loubet-Senear, K.; Srivastava, M.

2024-07-04 developmental biology
10.1101/2024.07.04.601589 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The wide distribution of regenerative capacity across the animal tree of life raises the question of how regeneration has evolved in distantly-related animals. Given that whole-body regeneration shares the same end-point - formation of a functional body plan - as embryonic development, it has been proposed that regeneration likely recapitulates developmental processes to some extent. Therefore, understanding how developmental processes are reactivated during regeneration is important for uncovering the evolutionary history of regeneration. Comparative transcriptomic studies in some species have revealed shared gene expression between development and regeneration, but it is not known whether these shared expression profiles correspond to shared functions, and which mechanisms activate expression of developmental genes during regeneration. We sought to address these questions using the acoel Hofstenia miamia, which is amenable to studies of both embryonic development and whole-body regeneration. By examining functionally validated regeneration processes during development at single-cell resolution, we found that whereas patterning and cellular differentiation are largely similar, wound response programs have distinct dynamics between development and regeneration. Chromatin accessibility analyses revealed that regardless of playing concordant or divergent roles during regeneration and development, genes expressed in both processes are frequently controlled by the same regulatory regions, potentially via utilization of distinct transcription factor binding sites. This study extends the known correspondence of development and regeneration from broad transcriptomic similarity to include patterning and differentiation processes. Further, our work provides a catalog of regulatory regions and binding sites that potentially regulate developmental genes during regeneration, fueling comparative studies of regeneration.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.