Back

Bacterial vaginosis-driven changes in vaginal T cell phenotypes and their implications for HIV susceptibility

MacLean, F.; Tsegaye, A. T.; Graham, J. B.; Swarts, J. L.; Vick, S. C.; Potchen, N.; Cruz Talavera, I.; Warrier, L.; Dubrulle, J.; Schroeder, L. K.; Mar, C.; Thomas, K. K.; Mack, M.; Sabo, M. C.; Chohan, B. H.; Ngure, K.; Mugo, N.; Lingappa, J. R.; Lund, J. M.

2024-07-05 immunology
10.1101/2024.07.03.601916 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a dysbiosis of the vaginal microbiome that is prevalent among reproductive-age females worldwide. Adverse health outcomes associated with BV include an increased risk of sexually-acquired HIV, yet the immunological mechanisms underlying this association are not well understood. To investigate BV-driven changes to cervicovaginal tract (CVT) and circulating T cell phenotypes, participants with or without BV provided vaginal tract (VT) and ectocervical (CX) tissue biopsies and PBMC samples. High-parameter flow cytometry revealed an increased frequency of cervical conventional CD4+ T cells (Tconv) expressing CCR5. However, we found no difference in number of CD3+CD4+CCR5+ cells in the CX or VT of BV+ vs BV- individuals, suggesting that BV-driven increased HIV susceptibility may not be solely attributed to increased CVT HIV target cell abundance. Flow cytometry also revealed that individuals with BV have an increased frequency of dysfunctional CX and VT CD39+ Tconv and CX tissue-resident CD69+CD103+ Tconv, reported to be implicated in HIV acquisition risk and replication. Many soluble immune factor differences in the CVT further support that BV elicits diverse and complex CVT immune alterations. Our comprehensive analysis expands on potential immunological mechanisms that may underlie the adverse health outcomes associated with BV including increased HIV susceptibility.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.