Back

Heat pre-treatment reduces multiplicity of plasmid transformations in yeast during electroporation, without diminishing the transformation efficiency

Wäneskog, M.; Hoch-Schneider, E. E.; Garg, S.; Kronborg Cantalapiedra, C.; Schaefer, E.; Krogh Jensen, M.; Damgaard Jensen, E.

2024-07-03 microbiology
10.1101/2024.07.03.601847 bioRxiv
Show abstract

High-throughput DNA transformation techniques are invaluable when creating high-diversity mutant libraries, and the success rate of any protein engineering endeavors is directly dependent on both the size and diversity of the mutant library that is to be screened. It is also widely accepted that in both bacteria and yeast there is an inverse correlation between the DNA transformation efficiency and the likelihood of transforming multiple DNA molecules into each cell. However, most successful high-throughput mutant screening efforts require high quality libraries, i.e., libraries comprised of cells with a clear phenotype-to-genotype relationship (one genotype/cell). Thus, DNA transformation methods with a high multiplicity of transformation are highly undesirable and detrimental to most mutant screening assays. Here we describe a simple, robust, and highly efficient yeast plasmid DNA transformation methodology, using a dual heat-shock and electroporation approach (HEEL) that generates more than 2 x 107 plasmid-transformed yeast cells per reaction, while simultaneously increasing the fraction of mono-transformed cells from 20% to more than 70% of the transformed population. By also using an automated yeast genotyping workflow coupled with a dual-barcoding approach, consisting of a SNP and high-diversity barcode (10N), we can consistently identify and enumerate unique plasmid genotypes within a heterogeneous population merely through Sanger sequencing. We demonstrate here that the size and quality of a transformed library no longer need to be inversely correlated when transforming large mutant DNA libraries in yeast using highly efficient DNA electroporation methods. SignificanceWith the recent expansion of artificial intelligence in the field of synthetic biology there has never been a greater need for high-quality data and reliable measurements of phenotype-to-genotype relationships. However, one major obstacle to creating accurate computer-based models is the current abundance of low-quality phenotypic measurements originating from numerous high-throughput, but low-resolution assays. Rather than increasing the quantity of measurements, new studies should aim to generate as accurate measurements as possible. The HEEL methodology presented here aims to address this issue by minimizing the problem of multi-plasmid uptake during high-throughput yeast DNA transformations, which leads to the creation of heterogeneous cellular genotypes. HEEL should enable highly accurate phenotype-to-genotype measurements going forward, which could be used to construct better computer-based models.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Yeast
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.5%
2
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.8%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.8%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
9
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
10
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
15
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
22
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.7%
27
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%