Back

AID-SLR: A Generative Artificial Intelligence-Driven Automated System for Systematic Literature Review

lee, k.; Datta, S.; Paek, H.; Rastegar-Mojarad, M.; Huang, L.-C.; He, L.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.

2024-07-04 oncology
10.1101/2024.07.03.24309897 medRxiv
Show abstract

Withdrawal StatementThe authors have withdrawn their manuscript owing to [Internal Revision]. Therefore, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as reference for the project. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Research Synthesis Methods
○ 20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
Similar papers in this journal
2
BMJ Open
● 601 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.1%
Similar papers in this journal
3
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.1%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
○ 31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
◐ 71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
7
Systematic Reviews
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
BMC Medical Research Methodology
○ 47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
10
Database
◐ 61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
11
BMC Health Services Research
○ 51 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
12
Value in Health
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
14
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
BMC Medicine
○ 176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Trials
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
18
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
19
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.9%
20
PLOS Digital Health
● 106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
22
JAMA Network Open
● 130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Pharmacology
○ 111 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
BMJ
● 51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Journal of Translational Medicine
○ 57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
PLOS Biology
● 486 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
27
Journal of Public Health
◐ 24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.