VIDAS(R) TB-IGRA accuracy in tuberculosis patients and persons at varying risk of exposure
Goletti, D.; Banaei, N.; Batra, R.; Berger, A. E.; Blazevic, A.; Botelho-Nevers, E.; Breen, R.; Bruiners, N.; Cambau, E.; Carbonnelle, E.; Daley, C. L.; Descotes-Genon, C.; Di Gennaro, F.; Doucet-Populaire, F.; Esmail, A.; Estrada Guzman, J. D.; Fontana, L.; Gennaro, M. L.; Handler, D.; Herrera Torres, R. M.; Hoft, D.; Ismail, N.; Isnard, M.; Lardizabal, A.; Lesage, F. X.; Lopes, A.; Lopez Vidal, W. L.; Machado Contreras, R.; Manivet, P.; Marotte, H.; Mechaï, F.; Medjahed-Artebasse, A.; Meldau, R.; Merieux, Y.; Morel, J.; Mougari, F.; Oelofse, S.; Palmieri, F.; Perrot, J. L.; Petruccioli, E.;
Show abstract
BackgroundDetection and treatment of individuals with presumed latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (i.e., excluding active disease; LTBI) is imperative to achieve global TB control, as they represent a potential transmission reservoir. However, more sensitive and user-friendly diagnostic tools are needed. MethodsWe evaluated the accuracy for TB infection detection of the new VIDAS(R) TB-IGRA (bioMerieux), a fully automated, single tube (thus eliminating the need for batch testing) overnight incubation assay, compared to the QuantiFERON(R)-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus, QIAGEN), in a global multi-centre cross-sectional study (NCT04048018) that included patients with TB disease (n=200) or participants at varying levels of TB exposure (n=1460; mixed exposure-risk-population). ResultsVIDAS(R) TB-IGRA identified TB disease with greater sensitivity than QFT-Plus (97.5% vs. 80.7%, P<0.01%), and yielding significantly fewer false-negatives (2.5% vs. 17.5%; P<0.01%) and indeterminate results (1.0% vs. 9.5%; P=0.02%). In the mixed exposure-risk-population, negative (NPA) and positive percent agreement (PPA) were 90.1% (1097/1217) and 92.1% (223/242), respectively. PPA increased with TB-exposure risk (up to 95.7% for high-risk participants), whereas NPA decreased (starting from 96.9% for low-risk participants). Regression analyses revealed that VIDAS(R) TB-IGRA had a better fit with the risk-exposure gradient than the QFT-Plus. Specificity in extremely low TB-exposure risk participants (n = 125) was high for both VIDAS(R) TB-IGRA and QFT-Plus (97.6% vs. 95.2%; P=8.33%). ConclusionsVIDAS(R) TB-IGRA displayed greater sensitivity than QFT-Plus, had a lower indeterminate rate, correlated better with an exposure gradient, and was highly specific, suggesting that it is a potentially valuable tool for the diagnosis of LTBI. Take-home messageThe first fully automated interferon-{gamma}-release assay--the bioMerieux VIDAS(R) TB-IGRA--is highly specific and displays greater sensitivity than QuantiFERON(R)-TB Gold Plus, and thus represents a valuable new and streamlined diagnostic tool for TB infection.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance characteristics of five antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic infection: a head-to-head benchmark comparison 92%
- Point-of-care evaluation of a rapid antigen test (CLINITEST® Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test) for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals 91%
- The performance of the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test as a tool for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in the population: A survey of routine laboratory RT-PCR test results from the region of Münster, Germany 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic performance of host protein signatures as a triage test for active pulmonary TB 95%
- A multiplex Mtb-specific FluoroSpot assay measuring IFNγ, TNF, and IL2-secreting cells can improve accuracy and differentiation across the tuberculosis spectrum 95%
- Host blood protein biomarkers to screen for Tuberculosis disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic Accuracy and Potential Resource Savings of Pooled Sputum Testing with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for Tuberculosis among adults in Vietnam: A Cross-Sectional Study 92%
- Self-testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection with rapid antigen tests 91%
- Real-life evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for SARS-CoV-2 detection in asymptomatic close contacts of COVID-19 patients 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exhaled Mycobacterium tuberculosis predicts incident infection in household contacts 94%
- New manual qPCR assay validated on tongue swabs collected and processed in Uganda shows sensitivity that rivals sputum-based molecular TB diagnostics 94%
- Revisiting the Natural History of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: a Bayesian Estimation of Natural Recovery and Mortality rates 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction models for adverse drug reactions during tuberculosis treatment in Brazil 92%
- SARS-CoV-2 Serosurveys: How antigen, isotype and threshold choices affect the outcome 91%
- Screening for SARS-CoV-2 in close contacts of individuals with confirmed infection: performance and operational considerations 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.