Back

VIDAS(R) TB-IGRA accuracy in tuberculosis patients and persons at varying risk of exposure

Goletti, D.; Banaei, N.; Batra, R.; Berger, A. E.; Blazevic, A.; Botelho-Nevers, E.; Breen, R.; Bruiners, N.; Cambau, E.; Carbonnelle, E.; Daley, C. L.; Descotes-Genon, C.; Di Gennaro, F.; Doucet-Populaire, F.; Esmail, A.; Estrada Guzman, J. D.; Fontana, L.; Gennaro, M. L.; Handler, D.; Herrera Torres, R. M.; Hoft, D.; Ismail, N.; Isnard, M.; Lardizabal, A.; Lesage, F. X.; Lopes, A.; Lopez Vidal, W. L.; Machado Contreras, R.; Manivet, P.; Marotte, H.; Mechaï, F.; Medjahed-Artebasse, A.; Meldau, R.; Merieux, Y.; Morel, J.; Mougari, F.; Oelofse, S.; Palmieri, F.; Perrot, J. L.; Petruccioli, E.;

2024-07-05 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.07.03.24309158 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDetection and treatment of individuals with presumed latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (i.e., excluding active disease; LTBI) is imperative to achieve global TB control, as they represent a potential transmission reservoir. However, more sensitive and user-friendly diagnostic tools are needed. MethodsWe evaluated the accuracy for TB infection detection of the new VIDAS(R) TB-IGRA (bioMerieux), a fully automated, single tube (thus eliminating the need for batch testing) overnight incubation assay, compared to the QuantiFERON(R)-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus, QIAGEN), in a global multi-centre cross-sectional study (NCT04048018) that included patients with TB disease (n=200) or participants at varying levels of TB exposure (n=1460; mixed exposure-risk-population). ResultsVIDAS(R) TB-IGRA identified TB disease with greater sensitivity than QFT-Plus (97.5% vs. 80.7%, P<0.01%), and yielding significantly fewer false-negatives (2.5% vs. 17.5%; P<0.01%) and indeterminate results (1.0% vs. 9.5%; P=0.02%). In the mixed exposure-risk-population, negative (NPA) and positive percent agreement (PPA) were 90.1% (1097/1217) and 92.1% (223/242), respectively. PPA increased with TB-exposure risk (up to 95.7% for high-risk participants), whereas NPA decreased (starting from 96.9% for low-risk participants). Regression analyses revealed that VIDAS(R) TB-IGRA had a better fit with the risk-exposure gradient than the QFT-Plus. Specificity in extremely low TB-exposure risk participants (n = 125) was high for both VIDAS(R) TB-IGRA and QFT-Plus (97.6% vs. 95.2%; P=8.33%). ConclusionsVIDAS(R) TB-IGRA displayed greater sensitivity than QFT-Plus, had a lower indeterminate rate, correlated better with an exposure gradient, and was highly specific, suggesting that it is a potentially valuable tool for the diagnosis of LTBI. Take-home messageThe first fully automated interferon-{gamma}-release assay--the bioMerieux VIDAS(R) TB-IGRA--is highly specific and displays greater sensitivity than QuantiFERON(R)-TB Gold Plus, and thus represents a valuable new and streamlined diagnostic tool for TB infection.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.