Back

Comparative Transcriptomics of Arabidopsis, Medicago, Brachypodium and Setaria species during Phosphorus limitation

Pant, P.; Duan, H.; Krom, N.; Scheible, W.-R.

2024-07-02 molecular biology
10.1101/2024.07.02.601706 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Translating biological knowledge from Arabidopsis to crop species is important to advance agriculture and secure food production in the face of dwindling fertilizer resources, biotic and abiotic stresses. However, it is often not trivial to identify functional homologs (orthologs) of Arabidopsis genes in crops. Combining sequence and expression data can improve the correct prediction of orthologs. Here, we conducted a large-scale RNA sequencing based transcriptomics study of Arabidopsis, Medicago, Brachypodium and Setaria grown side-by-side in Phosphorus (P)-sufficient and P-limited conditions to generate comparable transcriptomics datasets. Comparison of top 200 P-limitation induced genes in Arabidopsis revealed that [~]80% of these genes have identifiable close homologs in the other three species but only [~]50% retain their P-limitation response in the legume and grasses. Most of the hallmark genes of the P-starvation response were found conserved in all four species. This study reveals many known, novel, unannotated, conserved and species-specific regulations of the transcriptional P-starvation response. Identification and experimental verification of expressologs by independent RT-qPCR for P-limitation marker genes in Prunus showed the usefulness of comparative transcriptomics in pinpointing the functional orthologs in diverse crop species. This study provides an unprecedented resource for functional genomics and translational research to create P-efficient crops. HIGHLIGHTComparative transcriptomics reveals novel, known, conserved and specific transcriptome responding to Phosphorus limitation in Arabidopsis, Medicago, Brachypodium and Setaria to facilitate translational research in crops.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.8%
2
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.4%
3
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
5
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
7
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
8
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
9
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
11
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
15
Plant Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
16
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
19
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.5%