Cryptic recombination and transposition drive structural variation to shape genomic plasticity and life history traits in a host generalist fungal plant pathogen
Derbyshire, M. C.; Newman, T. E.; Khentry, Y.; Michael, P. J.; Bennett, S. J.; Rijal Lamichhane, A.; Graham-Taylor, C.; Chander, S.; Camplone, C.; Vicini, S.; Esquivel-Garcia, L.; Coutou, C.; Hegedus, D.; Clarkson, J.; Lindbeck, K.; Kamphuis, L. G.
Show abstract
BackgroundAn understanding of plant pathogen evolution is important for sustainable management of crop diseases. Plant pathogen populations must maintain adequate heritable phenotypic variability to survive. Polymorphisms >= 50 bp, known as structural variants (SVs), could contribute strongly to this variability by disrupting gene activities. SV acquisition is largely driven by mobile genetic elements called transposons, though a less appreciated source of SVs is erroneous meiotic double-strand break repair. The relative impacts of transposons and recombination on SV diversity and the overall contribution of SVs to phenotypic variability is elusive, especially in host generalists. ResultsWe use 25 high quality genomes to create a graphical pan-genome of the globally distributed host-generalist crop pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Outcrossing and recombination rates in this self-fertile species have been debated. Using bisulfite sequencing, and short read data from 190 strains, we show that S. sclerotiorum has many hallmarks of eukaryotic meiosis, including recombination hot and cold spots, centromeric and genic recombination suppression, and rapid linkage disequilibrium decay. Using a new statistic that captures average pairwise structural variation, we show that recombination and transposons make distinct contributions to SV diversity. Furthermore, despite only 5 % of genes being dispensable, SVs often had a stronger impact than other variants across 14 life history traits measured in 103 distinct strains. ConclusionTransposons and recombination make distinct contributions to SV diversity in S. sclerotiorum. Despite limited gene content diversity, SVs may strongly impact phenotypic variability. This sheds light on the genomic forces shaping adaptive flexibility in host generalists.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Temperature and genetic background drive mobilization of diverse transposable elements in a global human fungal pathogen 96%
- Long-term evolution of Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus pneumoniae leads to higher genetic diversity within rather than between human populations 96%
- Genomic and phenotypic insights into the expanding phylogenetic landscape of the Cryptococcus genus 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated assembly scaffolding elevates a new tomato system for high-throughput genome editing 95%
- Structural variation and DNA methylation shape the centromere-proximal meiotic crossover landscape in Arabidopsis 94%
- Annelid methylomes reveal ancestral developmental and ageing-associated epigenetic erosion across Bilateria 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population genomics and molecular epidemiology of wheat powdery mildew in Europe 97%
- Comparative genomics of Cryptococcus and Kwoniella reveals pathogenesis evolution and contrasting karyotype dynamics via intercentromeric recombination or chromosome fusion 96%
- Intragenomic conflicts with plasmids and chromosomal mobile genetic elements drive the evolution of natural transformation within species 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combining whole genome shotgun sequencing and rDNA amplicon analyses to improve detection of microbe-microbe interaction networks in plant leaves 95%
- Disentangling the impact of environmental and phylogenetic constraints on prokaryotic strain diversity 94%
- Plant-associated microbiomes promote nutrient turnover in impoverished substrates of a biodiversity hotspot 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.