Back

Enhancing reproducibility and decentralization in single cell research with biocytometry

Fikar, P.; Alvarez, L.; Berne, L.; Cienciala, M.; Kan, C.; Kasl, H.; Luo, M.; Novackova, Z.; Ordonez, S.; Sramkova, Z.; Holubova, M.; Lysak, D.; Avery, L.; Caro, A. A.; Crowder, R. N.; Diaz-Martinez, L. A.; Donley, D. W.; Giorno, R. R.; Reed, I. K. G.; Hensley, L. L.; Johnson, K. C.; Kim, P.; Kim, A. Y.; LaGier, A. J.; Newman, J. J.; Padilla-Crespo, E.; Reyna, N. S.; Tsotakos, N.; Al-Saadi, N. N.; Appleton, T.; Arosemena-Pickett, A.; Bell, B. A.; Bing, G.; Bishop, B.; Forde, C.; Foster, M. J.; Gray, K.; Hasley, B. L.; Johnson, K.; Jones, D. J.; LaShall, A. C.; McGuire, K.; McNaughton, N.; Morg

2024-07-03 cell biology
10.1101/2024.07.01.601489 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biomedicine today is experiencing a shift towards decentralized data collection, which promises enhanced reproducibility and collaboration across diverse laboratory environments. This inter-laboratory study evaluates the performance of biocytometry, a method utilizing engineered bioparticles for enumerating cells based on their surface antigen patterns. In a decentralized framework, spanning 78 assays conducted by 30 users across 12 distinct laboratories, biocytometry consistently demonstrated significant statistical power in discriminating numbers of target cells at varying concentrations as low as 1 cell per 100,000 background cells. User skill levels varied from expert to beginner capturing a range of proficiencies. Measurement was performed in a decentralized environment without any instrument cross-calibration or advanced user training outside of a basic instruction manual. The results affirm biocytometry to be a viable solution for immunophenotyping applications demanding sensitivity as well as scalability and reproducibility and paves the way for decentralized analysis of rare cells in heterogeneous samples.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.3%
4
mAbs
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
6
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
8
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
12
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
17
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.7%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.5%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
26
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%
27
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
29
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%