The Cambridge Questionnaire for Apathy and Impulsivity Traits (CamQUAIT): a novel assessment tool for frontotemporal lobar degeneration-related syndromes
Lansdall, C. J.; Williams, R. S.; Coyle-Gilchrist, I.; Murley, A. G.; Rouse, M. A.; Bateman, A.; Rowe, J. B.
Show abstract
State of the ArtApathy and impulsivity are common in syndromes associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). They are associated with high carer distress and poor patient outcomes. There are limited treatment options and progress has been hindered by a lack of appropriate outcome measures. This study aimed to develop a carer-rated questionnaire oriented to people with syndromes associated with FTLD. MethodologyPrincipal component and Rasch analysis were conducted on carer-, clinician- and patient-reported questionnaires and performance-based tests of behavioural change in the "Picks Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Prevalence and Incidence" (PiPPIN) study. We identified two key components which informed subsequent item development for a novel scale which we call the Cambridge Questionnaire for Apathy and Impulsivity Traits (CamQUAIT). The resulting scale comprised two subscales assessing "motivation and support" (CamQUAIT-M) and "impulsivity and challenging behaviours" (CamQUAIT-C). An independent sample of 132 carers for people with FTLD-associated syndromes completed the CamQUAIT, along with a battery of existing measures. The CamQUAIT was reduced to 15 items following Rasch analysis. ResultsBoth subscales showed good construct validity as assessed by high Person separation index (CamQUAIT-M=0.9; CamQUAIT-C=0.7) and Cronbachs alpha (CamQUAIT-M=0.9; CamQUAIT-C=0.8). The subscales correlated moderately with each other (r=0.376, p<0.001), and with existing measures of behavioural change. ConclusionThe CamQUAIT is a targeted measurement tool to assess apathy, impulsivity, and related behavioural change in the context of FTLD-related syndromes. The scale demonstrates good measurement properties and is sensitive to group differences, providing a suitable outcome measure to evaluate novel symptomatic treatments.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Are the Items of the Starkstein Apathy Scale Fit for the Purpose of Measuring Apathy Post-Stroke? 94%
- Development and Initial Validation of the Duke Misophonia Questionnaire 94%
- The measurement properties and acceptability of a new parent-infant bonding tool (‘Me and My Baby’) designed for use in a universal healthcare setting in the UK 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Capturing Trial-by-Trial Variability in Behaviour: People with Parkinson's Disease Exhibit a Greater Rate of Short-Term Fluctuations in Response Times 90%
- Delineating and validating higher-order dimensions of psychopathology in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study 89%
- Patterns of Autism Symptoms: Hidden Structure in the ADOS and ADI-R instruments 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Boston Cognitive Assessment (BOCA) — a comprehensive self-administered smartphone- and computer-based at-home test for longitudinal tracking of cognitive performance 92%
- Intentions of Canadian health professionals towards recommending exercise to people living with ALS. 88%
- Exploring Comorbidity Networks in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Subjects through Graph Theory: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Cognitive Deficits with Sociodemographic Characteristics among Adults with Post-COVID Conditions: Findings from the United States Household Pulse Survey 88%
- A Systematic Review of the Application of Computational Grounded Theory Method in Healthcare Research 86%
- A Prospective Cohort Study to Develop Multi-Biomarkers Panel to Define Biological Ageing in Five Different Cohorts from Newborn to Oldest Adult: A Study Protocol 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.