Womens Health And Manifestos (WHAM): UK General Election 2024, a rapid voter information study
Mullins, E.; Womersely, K.; Abdi, F.; Donovan-Bradley, C.; Ekechi, C.; Hazard, L.; Hirst, J.; Nana, M.; Perry, A.; Pinho-Gomes, A.-C.; Ripullone, K.; Williams, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe UK 2024 general election manifestos publicly set out the political parties priorities for the eventuality that they are voted into government. We determined to evaluate whether already agreed, evidenced and promoted issues affecting womens health in the UK had been included in the major parties manifestos. MethodsWe curated a longlist of priorities and recommendations drawn from major womens health reports, white papers, national inquiries and health strategies published in the UK over the last 10 years which are publicly available and invited our public contributors to suggest additional topics. We selected the shortlist of womens health-related priorities - our top 15 asks -using a Delphi process. We then devised a scoring system whereby manifestos were marked against the 15 priorities with a maximum of 2 points for each priority. We tested inter-rater reliability on the 2019 Manifesto. ResultsOverall, the limited inclusion of prominent issues for womens health in party manifestos was disappointing across the board. There was little difference between most major parties coverage of womens health in their manifestos. All were limited. Most parties addressed two issues well: childcare and women returning to work after pregnancy; and violence against women and girls and the prosecution of perpetrators. Several other issues, including assurance that all policy is built in consultation with women; decriminalisation and access to abortion; and womens health hubs for reproductive, menopause and lifelong health, were considered by none or only one of the major parties. DiscussionWomens health remains a fringe issue in UK politics, despite the efforts of patients, advocates and healthcare professionals to highlight the suffering that many women live with every day, and at particularly vulnerable and high risk periods of their life such as in pregnancy and the postpartum. Our analysis highlights the importance of developing previous efforts in womens health to strengthen existing infrastructure, collaboration and innovation. The next government should build on the work in progress, such as delivering the Womens Health Strategy (2022) rather than starting afresh.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Companionship for women using English maternity services during COVID-19: National and organisational perspectives 93%
- Cohort Profile: Born in Wales - a birth cohort with maternity, parental, and child data linkage for life course research in Wales, UK 93%
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23 94%
- Making maternity and neonatal care personalised in the COVID-19 pandemic: results from the Babies Born Better Survey in the UK and the Netherlands 93%
- Population birth outcomes in 2020 and experiences of expectant mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a ‘Born in Wales’ mixed methods study using routine data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social relationships and activities following elimination of SARS-CoV-2: a qualitative cross-sectional study 90%
- Challenges to self-isolation among contacts of cases of COVID-19: a national telephone survey in Wales 89%
- Does household income predict health and educational outcomes in childhood better than neighbourhood deprivation? 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hospital admissions among adolescents with local authority care experience or special educational needs in England: a population-based cohort study using linked administrative data from health, education and social care services 89%
- Delivering maternal and child health interventions through the private sector in LMIC: a scoping review of strategies and effective approaches 89%
- Changing parental perceptions to childhood immunisations during the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK: evidence from three cross-sectional surveys between 2020 and 2022 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of the Federated Data Platform's digital surgery scheduling system on elective theatre utilisation at an NHS Trust: an interrupted time series analysis 88%
- The performance of national COVID-19 ‘Symptom Checkers’: A comparative case simulation study 87%
- Cracking the Code: A Scoping Review to Unite Disciplines in Tackling Legal Issues in Health Artificial Intelligence 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.