Back

Assessing the potential of ChatGPT-4 to accurately identify drug-drug interactions and provide clinical pharmacotherapy recommendations

Most, A.; Chase, A.; Sikora, A.

2024-06-30 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2024.06.29.24309701 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLarge language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have emerged as promising artificial intelligence tools to support clinical decision making. The ability of ChatGPT to evaluate medication regimens, identify drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and provide clinical recommendations is unknown. The purpose of this study is to examine the performance of GPT-4 to identify clinically relevant DDIs and assess accuracy of recommendations provided. MethodsA total of 15 medication regimens were created containing commonly encountered DDIs that were considered either clinically significant or clinically unimportant. Two separate prompts were developed for medication regimen evaluation. The primary outcome was if GPT-4 identified the most relevant DDI within the medication regimen. Secondary outcomes included rating GPT-4s interaction rationale, clinical relevance ranking, and overall clinical recommendations. Interrater reliability was determined using kappa statistic. ResultsGPT-4 identified the intended DDI in 90% of medication regimens provided (27/30). GPT-4 categorized 86% as highly clinically relevant compared to 53% being categorized as highly clinically relevant by expert opinion. Inappropriate clinical recommendations potentially causing patient harm were provided in 14% of responses provided by GPT-4 (2/14), and 63% of responses contained accurate information but incomplete recommendations (19/30). ConclusionsWhile GPT-4 demonstrated promise in its ability to identify clinically relevant DDIs, application to clinical cases remains an area of investigation. Findings from this study may assist in future development and refinement of LLMs for drug-drug interaction queries to assist in clinical decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
2
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
5
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
6
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
10
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
12
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
13
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
17
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Epilepsy Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%