Assessing the potential of ChatGPT-4 to accurately identify drug-drug interactions and provide clinical pharmacotherapy recommendations
Most, A.; Chase, A.; Sikora, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundLarge language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have emerged as promising artificial intelligence tools to support clinical decision making. The ability of ChatGPT to evaluate medication regimens, identify drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and provide clinical recommendations is unknown. The purpose of this study is to examine the performance of GPT-4 to identify clinically relevant DDIs and assess accuracy of recommendations provided. MethodsA total of 15 medication regimens were created containing commonly encountered DDIs that were considered either clinically significant or clinically unimportant. Two separate prompts were developed for medication regimen evaluation. The primary outcome was if GPT-4 identified the most relevant DDI within the medication regimen. Secondary outcomes included rating GPT-4s interaction rationale, clinical relevance ranking, and overall clinical recommendations. Interrater reliability was determined using kappa statistic. ResultsGPT-4 identified the intended DDI in 90% of medication regimens provided (27/30). GPT-4 categorized 86% as highly clinically relevant compared to 53% being categorized as highly clinically relevant by expert opinion. Inappropriate clinical recommendations potentially causing patient harm were provided in 14% of responses provided by GPT-4 (2/14), and 63% of responses contained accurate information but incomplete recommendations (19/30). ConclusionsWhile GPT-4 demonstrated promise in its ability to identify clinically relevant DDIs, application to clinical cases remains an area of investigation. Findings from this study may assist in future development and refinement of LLMs for drug-drug interaction queries to assist in clinical decision-making.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient-Reported Reasons for Antihypertensive Medication Change: A Quantitative Study Using Social Media 93%
- Standardization of drug names in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: The DiAna dictionary 93%
- Large-scale empirical identification of candidate comparators for pharmacoepidemiological studies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- MTXPK.org: A clinical decision support tool evaluating high-dose methotrexate pharmacokinetics to inform post-infusion care and use of glucarpidase 91%
- DrugWAS: Leveraging drug-wide association studies to facilitate drug repurposing for COVID-19 89%
- A user-driven framework for dose selection in pregnancy: proof-of-concept for sertraline 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pharmacogenomics implementation training improve self-efficacy and competency to drive adoption in clinical practice 94%
- Real-world observation on response to cholinesterase inhibitors or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors prescribed to outpatients with dementia using electronic medical records 90%
- Reported Drug Spectrum and Disproportionality Signals for Malignant Neoplasm Progression in FAERS: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Medication Clusters at Hospital Discharge and Risk of Adverse Drug Events at 30-days Post-Discharge: A Population-based Cohort Study of Older Adults 90%
- A comprehensive assessment of statin discontinuation among patients who concurrently initiate statins and CYP3A4-inhibitor drugs; a multistate transition model 89%
- Sensitivity of Estimated Tacrolimus Population Pharmacokinetic Profile to Inaccurate Assumptions about Dose Timing and Absorption: An Investigation in Real-World and Simulated Data 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- COHD-COVID: Columbia Open Health Data for COVID-19 Research 91%
- Assessing ChatGPT’s Mastery of Bloom’s Taxonomy using psychosomatic medicine exam questions 90%
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.