Phospholipase Cgamma regulates lacrimal gland branching by competing with PI3K in phosphoinositide metabolism
Wang, Q.; Tao, C.; Wu, Y.; Anderson, K. E.; Hannan, A.; Lin, C.-s.; Hawkins, P. T.; Stephens, L.; Zhang, X.
Show abstract
Although the regulation of branching morphogenesis by spatially distributed cues is well established, the role of intracellular signaling in determining the branching pattern remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the regulation and function of phospholipase C gamma (PLC{gamma}) in Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) signaling in lacrimal gland development. We showed that deletion of PLC{gamma}1 in the lacrimal gland epithelium leads to ectopic branching and acinar hyperplasia, which was phenocopied by either mutating the PLC{gamma}1 binding site on Fgfr2 or disabling any of its SH2 domains. PLC{gamma}1 inactivation did not change the level of Fgfr2 or affect MAPK signaling, but instead led to sustained AKT phosphorylation due to increased PIP3 production. Consistent with this, PLC{gamma}1 mutant phenotype can be reproduced by elevation of PI3K signaling in Pten knockout and attenuated by blocking AKT signaling. This study demonstrated that PLC{gamma} modulates PI3K signaling by shifting phosphoinositide metabolism, revealing an important role of signaling dynamics in conjunction with spatial cues in shaping branching morphogenesis.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Shc1 cooperates with Frs2 and Shp2 to recruit Grb2 in FGF-induced lens development 97%
- Ciliary and extraciliary Gpr161 pools repress hedgehog signaling in a tissue-specific manner 96%
- Mutations that prevent phosphorylation of the BMP4 prodomain impair proteolytic maturation of homodimers leading to lethality in mice 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.