Back

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis is associated with increased all-cause mortality

Li, Z.; Song, R.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, J.; Chen, Z.

2024-06-30 gastroenterology
10.1101/2024.06.28.24309687 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRecently, the new nomenclature metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) was proposed to supersede non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). To optimize the management of these patients, it is crucial to comprehend the similarities and differences between individuals with NASH and MASH. MethodsWe analyzed data from 13,846 participants in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, along with their linked mortality through 2019. NASH and MASH were defined based on respective criteria. Survey-weight adjusted multivariable Cox proportional model was used to examine mortality. ResultsThe overall prevalence of steatohepatitis, NASH and MASH was 5.7% (n=788), 4.1% (n=564) and 5.5% (n=763), respectively. Most individuals with NASH (96.8%) could be categorized as MASH, but only 69.7% individuals with MASH qualified as NASH. During a median follow-up of 27 years, individuals with MASH exhibited a 53% higher risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.53, 95% CI 1.24-1.89). But individuals with NASH didnt show an association with all-cause mortality after adjustment for metabolic risk factors (aHR 1.14, 95% CI 0.91-1.44). Notably, individuals who met the criteria for MASH but not NASH (NASH(-)/MASH(+)) had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (aHR 2.47, 95% CI 1.71-3.57) compared to those with NASH(+)/MASH(+) (aHR 1.22, 95% CI 0.97-1.55). Moreover, advanced fibrosis was only associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in individuals with MASH, not NASH. ConclusionsMASH, rather than NASH, was associated with an elevated risk of all-cause mortality after adjusting for metabolic risk factors. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to assess and validate our findings.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JHEP Reports
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.8%
2
Journal of Hepatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
3
Hepatology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Hepatology Communications
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
5
Gut
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
8
Gastroenterology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
9
Gastro Hep Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
10
American Journal of Gastroenterology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.4%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
13
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
14
Diabetes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
15
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
16
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease
26 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Molecular Therapy Methods & Clinical Development
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%