Back

Clinical characteristics and prognosis in patients with acute myocarditis or unexplained acute chest pain: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study

Björkenstam, M.; Bobbio, E.; Polte, C. L.; Hjalmarsson, C.; Bergh, N.; Omerovic, E.; Bollano, E.

2024-06-28 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.06.27.24309618
Show abstract

BackgroundAcute myocarditis is a disease with variable prognosis, ranging from complete recovery to end-stage heart failure (HF) and death. The aim of this study was to examine the risk of mortality and HF in patients with suspected acute myocarditis (AM) in comparison to patients hospitalized for unexplained acute chest pain (ACP). MethodsWe used the SWEDEHEART-registry to identify patients >16 years admitted to hospital between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2018 with either AM or ACP. Risks of all-cause mortality and development of HF were calculated and compared by use of adjusted Cox regression analyses. ResultsA total of 3,792 patients with AM and 109,934 patients with ACP were included. Median follow-up time was 7.8 years (Q1, Q3; 3.4, 12.3). AM patients were younger compared to ACP patients, median age 37 years (Q1, Q3; 26, 52) vs 59 years (Q1, Q3; 49, 69), and more likely to be men (79.9% vs 51.4%, p <0.001). Comorbidity burden was lower within the AM cohort. Chest pain was the most common presenting symptom in both groups. Mortality rate at 30 days (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.9-7.3, p<0,001) as well as long term (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.69-2.39, p <0.001) were significantly higher among AM patients and AM patients were more likely to develop HF during follow-up (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.81-2.93, p<0,001). ConclusionsAM patients had a worse short -and long-term outcome compared with ACP. The risk for development of HF was higher for AM patients even after the first year.

Matching journals

1
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
#1
71× avg
2
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 1%
27× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 52%
9.7%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 4%
9.4× avg
5
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 2%
18× avg
6
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 1%
27× avg
7
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 1%
31× avg
8
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 25%
4.5%
9
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.7%
43× avg
10
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 2%
17× avg
11
Circulation: Heart Failure
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.6%
38× avg
12
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.4%
32× avg
13
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 66%
2.2%
14
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
Top 1%
26× avg
15
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
22× avg
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 9%
2.9× avg
17
Heart Rhythm
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 2%
8.0× avg
18
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 17%
1.6× avg
19
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
17× avg
20
BMJ
BMJ · based on 49 published papers
Top 5%
4.6× avg
21
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 3%
5.3× avg
22
ERJ Open Research
European Respiratory Society (ERS) · based on 36 published papers
Top 3%
4.1× avg
23
Atherosclerosis
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 4%
4.6× avg