Association of preserved ratio impaired spirometry with mortality and airflow obstruction in the silicotics: a longitudinal cohort study
Yang, S.; Tse, L. A.
Show abstract
RationalePreserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), defined as an impaired forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) with a preserved ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FVC), is associated with increased risk of airflow obstruction (AFO) and mortality in the general population. However, evidence is limited among the individuals with silicosis, an old occupational disease with an ongoing outbreak in some developed countries. ObjectivesTo investigate the association of PRISm with the risk of mortality and incident AFO in a cohort of workers with silicosis. MethodsA total of 4315 workers aged 18-80 years and diagnosed with silicosis at the Pneumoconiosis Clinic, Tuberculosis and Chest Service during 1981-2019 were enrolled in this study and followed up for a median of 12.3 years till 31 December 2019. Spirometry was included in the diagnostic examination of silicosis and follow-up reassessments. Lung function categories of participants were classified as normal spirometry (FEV1/FVC [≥] 0.7, FEV1 [≥] 80% predicted), PRISm (FEV1/FVC [≥] 0.7, FEV1 < 80% predicted), and AFO (FEV1/FVC < 0.7). The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for age, body mass index, tuberculosis history, smoking, and radiographic characteristics. Measurements and Main ResultsDuring the follow-up period, a total of 2399 (55.6%) subjects died, 1359 of whom died from respiratory-related diseases, and 780 subjects developed AFO. Subjects with PRISm had significantly increased multivariable-adjusted risk of all-cause death (adjusted HR=1.63, 95% CI 1.44-1.85) and respiratory-related mortality (adjusted HR=1.74, 95% CI 1.48-2.05) as compared with the those with normal spirometry. Besides, there was a higher risk of developing AFO in subjects with PRISm than in those with normal spirometry (adjusted HR=1.46, 95% CI 1.22-1.75). No significant interaction was observed between PRISm and smoking status in the risk of all-cause mortality and incident AFO. ConclusionsPRISm is significantly associated with increased all-cause and respiratory-related mortality and a greater risk of progression to AFO among the individuals with silicosis.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term exposure to air pollution and risk of adult-onset asthma and COPD: Danish nationwide cohort study 93%
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in adults exposed to fine particles from a coal mine fire 91%
- Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Hospitalizations after COPD Hospitalization among Older Adults 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The protective effect of club cell secretory protein (CC-16) on COPD risk and progression: a Mendelian randomisation study 93%
- Pulmonary Fibrosis after COVID-19 is Associated with Severity of Illness and Blood Leukocyte Telomere Length 91%
- Mendelian randomisation analyses of eosinophils and other blood cell types in relation to lung function and disease. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mouse pulmonary pathological characteristics induced by Asian-mineral dust transported with Coniothyrium fuckelii at a high altitude of 2,000 meters 94%
- Immune, metabolic, anatomical, and functional features of people after successful tuberculosis treatment: an exploratory analysis 92%
- Ozone exposure upregulates the expression of host susceptibility protein TMPRSS2 to SARS-CoV-2 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clustering-based COPD Subtypes Have Distinct Longitudinal Outcomes and Multi-omics Biomarkers 94%
- Relative Contributions of Family History and a Polygenic Risk Score on COPD and Related Outcomes: COPDGene and ECLIPSE studies 92%
- Monocyte and neutrophil levels are potentially linked to progression to IPF for patients with indeterminate UIP CT pattern 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.