Custom Biomedical FAIR Data Analysis in the Cloud Using CAVATICA
Berke, S. R.; Kanchan, K.; Marazita, M. L.; Tobin, E.; Ruczinski, I.
Show abstract
The historically fragmented biomedical data ecosystem has moved towards harmonization under the findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) data principles, creating more opportunities for cloud-based research. This shift is especially opportune for scientists across diverse domains interested in implementing creative, nonstandard computational analytic pipelines on large and varied datasets. However, executing custom cloud analyses may present difficulties, particularly for investigators lacking advanced computational expertise. Here, we present an accessible, streamlined approach for the cloud compute platform CAVATICA that offers a solution. We outline how we developed a custom workflow in the cloud, for analyzing whole genome sequences of case-parent trios to detect sex-specific genetic effects on orofacial cleft risk, which required several programming languages and custom software packages. The approach involves just three components: Docker to containerize software environments, tool creation for each analysis step, and a visual workflow editor to weave the tools into a Common Workflow Language (CWL) pipeline. Our approach should be accessible to any investigator with basic computational skills, is readily extended to implement any scalable high-throughput biomedical data analysis in the cloud, and is applicable to other commonly used compute platforms such as BioData Catalyst. We believe our approach empowers versatile data reuse and promotes accelerated biomedical discovery in a time of substantial FAIR data.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Orchestrating and sharing large multimodal data for transparent and reproducible research 97%
- The 4D Nucleome Data Portal: a resource for searching and visualizing curated nucleomics data 96%
- Comprehensive generation, visualization, and reporting of quality control metrics for single-cell RNA sequencing data 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.