Natural Variation in HIV-1 Entry Kinetics Map to Specific Residues and Reveal an Interdependence Between Attachment and Fusion
Webb, N.; Tobin, N. H.; Aldrovandi, G.; Sanchez, C.; Sevareid, C.
Show abstract
HIV-1 entry kinetics reflect the fluid motion of the HIV envelope glycoprotein through at least three major structural configurations that drive virus-cell membrane fusion. The lifetime of each state is an important component of potency for inhibitors that target them. We used the time-of-addition inhibitor assay and a novel analytical strategy to define the kinetics of pre-hairpin exposure (using T20) and co-receptor engagement (via. maraviroc), through a characteristic delay metric, across a variety of naturally occurring HIV Env isolates. Among 257 distinct HIV-1 envelope isolates we found a remarkable breadth of T20 and maraviroc delays ranging from as early as 30 seconds to as late as 60 minutes. The most extreme delays were observed among transmission-linked clade C isolates. We identified four single-residue determinants of late T20 and maraviroc delays that are associated with either receptor engagement or gp41 function. Comparison of these delays with T20 sensitivity suggest co-receptor engagement and fusogenic activity in gp41 act cooperatively but sequentially to drive entry. Our findings support current models of entry where co-receptor engagement drives gp41 eclipse and have strong implications for the design of entry inhibitors and antibodies that target transient entry states. Author Summary.The first step of HIV-1 infection is entry, where virus-cell membrane fusion is driven by the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein through a series of conformational changes. Some of the most broadly active entry inhibitors work by binding conformations that exist only transiently during entry. The lifetimes of these states and the kinetics of entry are important elements of inhibitor activity for which little is known. We demonstrate a remarkable range of kinetics among 257 diverse HIV-1 isolates and find that this phenotype is highly flexible, with multiple single-residue determinants. Examination of the kinetics of two conformational landmarks shed light on novel kinetic features that offer new details about the role of co-receptor engagement and provide a framework to explain entry inhibitor synergy.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Interferon Resistance of Transmitted HIV-1 is a Consequence of Enhanced Replicative Fitness 97%
- A de novo approach to inferring within-host fitness effects during untreated HIV-1 infection 96%
- Adaptation of a transmitted/founder simian-human immunodeficiency virus for enhanced replication in rhesus macaques 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- HIV-1 Vif gained breadth in APOBEC3G specificity after cross-species transmission of its precursors 97%
- The fusion peptide proximal region of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins regulates exposure of immunogenic epitopes at the trimer base 96%
- Impact of suboptimal APOBEC3G neutralization on the emergence of HIV drug resistance in humanized mice 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mechanistic Analysis of the Broad Antiretroviral Resistance Conferred by HIV-1 Envelope Glycoprotein Mutations 96%
- HIV proviral burden, genetic diversity and dynamics in viremic controllers who subsequently initiated suppressive antiretroviral therapy 95%
- The HIV-1 envelope cytoplasmic tail protects infected cells from ADCC by downregulating CD4 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal clonal dynamics of HIV-1 latent reservoirs measured by combination quadruplex polymerase chain reaction and sequencing 95%
- A near-full-length HIV-1 genome from 1966 recovered from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue 95%
- Antigenic cartography using variant-specific hamster sera reveals substantial antigenic variation among Omicron subvariants 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.