Development and validation of risk prediction models for childhood, teenage and young adult cancers: research protocol and statistical analysis plan
Saatci, D.; Harnden, A.; Hippisley-Cox, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundChildhood, teenage and young adult (CTYA, 0-24 years) cancers are rare and diverse, making timely diagnosis challenging. Studies based on adult cancers suggest that the development and integration of clinical decision tools in primary care aid earlier cancer detection, yet, these have not been explored for CTYA cancers. AimTo develop and validate a primary care-based risk prediction tool to identify CTYA who are at increased risk of cancer. Methods and analysisUsing the QResearch Database, a nationally representative primary care database, we will generate an open cohort of children, teenagers and young adults (0-24 years) who were registered with a GP between 1st January 1998 and 31st December 2019. CTYA will be followed up from the date at which the first cancer-relevant symptom is recorded in the records (index date) until the date of cancer diagnosis/6-months, whichever comes first. Candidate variables will include symptoms, signs, blood test results and demographic factors. Model derivation will include two approaches, Cox regression and logistic regression. Apparent performance of the derived model will be explored and subsequently internally-externally cross-validated to investigate performance heterogeneity and geographical transportability.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of multivariable machine learning algorithms to predict risk of cancer in symptomatic patients referred urgently from primary care 94%
- Psychological Impact of the Galleri Test (sIG(n)al): Protocol for a longitudinal evaluation of the psychological impact of receiving a cancer signal in the NHS-Galleri Trial 94%
- Identifying markers of health-seeking behaviour and healthcare access in UK electronic health records 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inequalities in the decline and recovery of pathological cancer diagnoses during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study 93%
- Patient attrition in Molecular Tumour Boards: A Review 92%
- BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for diagnostic germline genetic testing within a UK breast oncology setting: a randomised, non-inferiority trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of worldwide, national and sub-national severity distributions in Burden of Disease studies: a case study of individual cancer types in Scotland 92%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 92%
- Patterns of rates of mortality in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combining faecal immunochemical testing with blood test results to identify patients with symptoms at risk of colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort of 16,604 patients tested in primary care 93%
- Risk of cancer in regular and low meat-eaters, fish-eaters, and vegetarians: a prospective analysis of UK Biobank participants 91%
- Determinants of pre-vaccination antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK) 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simple Linear Cancer Risk Prediction Models with Novel Features Outperform Complex Approaches 91%
- Towards Predicting 30-Day Readmission among Oncology Patients: Identifying Timely and Actionable Risk Factors 91%
- Use of natural language understanding to facilitate surgical de-escalation of axillary staging in patients with breast cancer 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.