IMPROVE-IT2: Implementing non-invasive circulating tumor DNA analysis to optimize the operative and postoperative treatment for patients with colorectal cancer - Intervention Trial 2: Statistical analysis plan
Gotschalck, K. A.; Heide-Jorgensen, U.; Iversen, L. H.; Andersen, C. L.
Show abstract
BackgroundSurveillance after curative intended surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for localized colorectal cancer (CRC) aim at detecting recurrence sufficiently early to allow efficient treatment. Minimally invasive blood-based analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has the potential to identify patients with microscopic residual disease early after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for CRC, with a median lead time of 9 months compared to standard-of-care CT-based surveillance. The IMPROVE-IT2 study is a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of ctDNA-guided surveillance compared to standard-of-care CT-based surveillance in high-risk stage II and stage III CRC patients after curative intended surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary trial endpoint is the fraction of recurrence patients receiving curative intended surgery or local metastasis directed treatment within 3 years after primary surgery for CRC. Secondary endpoints include time-to-clinical-recurrence, overall survival, quality-of-life, and quality-adjusted life-years cost-effectiveness. ObjectiveTo outline a pre-determined statistical analysis plan (SAP) before patients have completed the first year of follow-up after primary surgery. MethodsThe SAP describes the IMPROVE-IT2 study design and endpoints, the randomization procedure, sample size estimation, and the specific statistical procedures and methods for analyzing efficacy outcomes. Health economics and quality of life analyses are not included in this SAP but will be analyzed separately. The SAP outlines the planned primary analyses, subgroup analyses, and a range of specific sensitivity analyses. To avoid bias, the final analyses of the IMPROVE-IT2 trial will adhere to the SAP. The SAP was approved after end of recruitment and before completion of the first 12 months of follow-up after primary surgery. Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT04084249, registered in April 2019.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychological Impact of the Galleri Test (sIG(n)al): Protocol for a longitudinal evaluation of the psychological impact of receiving a cancer signal in the NHS-Galleri Trial 93%
- Surgical Resection, Radiotherapy, And Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Stage 1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis 93%
- Reproducibility and transparency characteristics of oncology research evidence 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- UKCTOCS Update: Applying insights of delayed effects in cancer screening trials to the long-term follow-up mortality analysis 95%
- The Melanoma Genomics Managing Your Risk Study randomised controlled trial: Statistical Analysis Plan 91%
- Trials that turn from retrospectively registered to prospectively registered: A cohort study of ‘retroactively prospective’ clinical trial registration using history data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 93%
- The Role of Prehabilitation in Improving Brain Health and Cognition After Chemotherapy in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: Study Protocol of the Chemo Brain Prehab Project 92%
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- ALLIANCE A022104/NRG-GI010: The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial: a randomized phase II/III trial testing the efficacy of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy regarding clinical complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer 96%
- Study Protocol of A Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Neo-adjuvant Pembrolizumab and Radiotherapy in Localized Rectal Cancer 95%
- Landscape of Clinical Trials in Cancer Cachexia: Assessment of Trends From 1995-2024 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bayesian Interim Analysis and Efficiency of Phase III Randomized Trials 93%
- Immortal time bias in older vs younger age groups: a simulation study with application to a population-based cohort of patients with colon cancer 92%
- BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for diagnostic germline genetic testing within a UK breast oncology setting: a randomised, non-inferiority trial 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.