Back

The Economic Burden Of Invasive Forms Of Meningococcal Infection

Serhiyenka, K.; Kozhanova, I.; Romanova, O.; Solodov, A.; Skutova, P.

2024-06-27 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.06.25.24309375 medRxiv
Show abstract

RelevanceInvasive meningococcal infection (IMI) is a significant clinical problem and is associated with a high probability of severe complications and death. Vaccination programs against meningococcus can achieve significant clinical effectiveness and require significant financial costs. This makes it relevant to study the economic burden of meningococcal infection in the conditions of modern healthcare in order to obtain basic data for subsequent research in the field of evaluation of medical technologies. AimsTo assess the economic burden of IMI in children in the conditions of healthcare in the Republic of Belarus. Material and methodsa retrospective study using the "cost of illness" method was conducted for 22 children hospitalized in the city childrens infectious clinical diseases hospital in 2018-2019. All values are presented in belarusian rubles. The average {+/-} standard deviation, minimum - maximum values, median [Q1, Q3], cost shares (%) are calculated for the cost values. The minimum- maximum values and median [Q1, Q3] were calculated for the age of the patients. Resultstaking into account the costs of treatment in healthcare organizations of all patients studied, the share of direct costs of hospitalization was 29.0%, the share of direct costs of diagnosis - 7.2%, the share of direct costs of pharmacotherapy - 8.3%. A significant part of the costs accounted for observations after discharge and amounted to 55.4%. Conclusiona retrospective study of the economic burden of MI in the Republic of Belarus using the "cost of illness" method in patients hospitalized in a public health organization demonstrates a significant economic burden of this disease, which in the long term is primarily due to the presence of complications in the patient, as well as the impact of the patients death on the value of total costs.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.