Spatial fingerprint of consumer body size and habitat preference on resource distribution
Little, C. J.; Banville, P. E.; Ford, A. T.; Germain, R. M.
Show abstract
Consumers shape spatial patterns on landscapes by amplifying or dampening environmental heterogeneity through feeding, excretion, and movement of resources. The degree to which the environment is modified by consumers depends on species traits, including body mass, movement and foraging behavior, and habitat specialization. Global change is altering the size and traits of consumer populations, but our understanding of how this may impact resource heterogeneity is limited. Here, we developed an individual-based model of habitat specialists and generalists movement and activity in a patchy landscape and investigated the impact of changes in population and mean body sizes on landscape-scale resource heterogeneity. We found that consumers specializing on low-resource habitats (a common risk avoidance strategy) increased spatial resource heterogeneity regardless of their population and body size. By contrast, generalists eroded differences among habitats, and we further found that resource heterogeneity decreased with the average body size of generalist consumers, even while controlling for total consumer biomass. Larger perceptual ranges increased the area over which generalist consumers could select foraging habitat, and reduced the extent to which they eroded landscape structure. These nuanced spatial outcomes of consumer-resource interactions emerge from how metabolic demands, which scale nonlinearly with body size, play out among habitat types which attract different consumers, as well as the scale at which those consumers make habitat selection decisions. Since global change disproportionately impacts larger species and specialists, indirect consequences on ecosystems may arise via biotic processes, affecting spatial heterogeneity of future landscapes.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Geometric and demographic effects explain contrasting fragmentation-biodiversity relationships across scales 96%
- Temporal environmental variation imposes differential selection on genomic and ecological traits of virtual plant communities 96%
- To disperse or compete? Coevolution of traits leads to a limited number of reproductive strategies 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The geography of metacommunities: landscape characteristics drive geographic variation in the assembly process through selecting species pool attributes 96%
- Evolution of Plant Niche Construction Traits in Biogeomorphic Landscapes 96%
- The joint evolution of animal movement and competition strategies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- At what spatial scales are alternative stable states relevant in highly interconnected ecosystems? 95%
- Inferring ecological selection from multidimensional community trait distributions along environmental gradients 94%
- Dispersal limitation and fire feedbacks maintain mesic savannas in Madagascar 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- RangeShifter 2.0: An extended and enhanced platform for modelling spatial eco-evolutionary dynamics and species' responses to environmental changes. 94%
- Matching the forecast horizon with the relevant spatial and temporal processes and data sources 94%
- Testing the ability of species distribution models to infer variable importance 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.