Back

Impact of dendritic non-linearities on the computational capabilities of neurons

Lauditi, C.; Malatesta, E. M.; Pittorino, F.; Baldassi, C.; Brunel, N.; Zecchina, R.

2024-06-28 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.06.24.600504 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multiple neurophysiological experiments have shown that dendritic non-linearities can have a strong influence on synaptic input integration. In this work we model a single neuron as a two-layer computational unit with non-overlapping sign-constrained synaptic weights and a biologically plausible form of dendritic non-linearity, which is analytically tractable using statistical physics methods. Using both analytical and numerical tools, we demonstrate several key computational advantages of non-linear dendritic integration with respect to models with linear synaptic integration. We find that the dendritic non-linearity concurrently enhances the number of possible learned input-output associations and the learning velocity, and we characterize how capacity and learning speed depend on the implemented non-linearity and the levels of dendritic and somatic inhibition. We find that experimentally observed connection probabilities naturally emerge in neurons with sign-constrained synapses as a consequence of non-linear dendritic integration, while in models with linear integration, an additional robustness parameter must be introduced in order to reproduce realistic connection probabilities. Non-linearly induced sparsity comes with a second central advantage for neuronal information processing, i.e. input and synaptic noise robustness. By testing our model on standard real-world benchmark datasets inspired by deep learning practice, we observe empirically that the non-linearity provides an enhancement in generalization performance, showing that it enables to capture more complex input/output relations.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.