Back

Activity-dependent lateral inhibition enables the synchronization of olfactory bulb projection neurons

Dalal, T.; Haddad, R.

2024-10-15 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.06.24.600470 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Information in the brain is represented by the activity of neuronal ensembles. These ensembles are adaptive and dynamic, formed and truncated based on the animals experience. One mechanism by which spatially distributed neurons form an ensemble is by synchronizing their spike times in response to a sensory event. In the olfactory bulb, odor stimulation evokes rhythmic gamma activity in spatially distributed mitral and tufted cells (MTCs). This rhythmic activity is thought to enhance the relay of odor information to the downstream olfactory targets. However, how specifically the odor-activated MTCs are synchronized is unknown. Here, we demonstrate that optogenetic activation of one set of MTCs can gamma-entrain the spiking activity of another set. This lateral synchronization was particularly effective when the recorded MTC fired at the gamma rhythm, facilitating the synchronization of only the substantially active MTCs. Furthermore, we show that lateral synchronization did not depend on the distance between the MTCs and is mediated by granule-cell layer neurons. In contrast, lateral inhibition between MTCs that reduced their firing rates was spatially restricted to adjacent MTCs and was not mediated by granule-cell layer neurons. This dissociation between these two interaction types suggests that they are mediated by different neural circuits. Our findings propose a simple yet robust mechanism by which spatially distributed neurons entrain each other spiking activity to form an ensemble. HighlightsO_LIMTC activation entrains the spike timing of other MTCs in an activity-dependent and distance-independent manner. C_LIO_LIMTC to MTC suppression is activity- and distance-dependent C_LIO_LISpatially distributed Granule cell layer neurons control MTCs spike timing, yet do not substantially affect their odor-evoked firing rate. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.