Milliseconds matter: Biomechanical inverse dynamics analysis is highly sensitive to imperfect data synchronization
Lemaire, K. K.; Kuo, A. D.
Show abstract
Inverse dynamics analysis is the primary means of quantifying joint moments and powers from biomechanical data. The data are often combined from force plates, motion capture cameras, and perhaps body-worn inertial sensors, and must be temporally synchronized to avoid potentially large inverse dynamics errors. The principles behind the errors, and the sensitivities for movements such as human walking, have yet to be demonstrated. Here we quantify how inverse dynamics computations of joint moments, powers, and work are highly sensitive to temporal mis-synchronization. We do this with (1) a theoretical examination of inverse dynamics, supported by (2) a simulated multi-body jumping movement, and (3) experimental human walking data. The theoretical analysis shows that root-mean-square errors in joint powers increase linearly with temporal mis-synchronization, and increase more for faster movements. With the other analyses we quantify the specific amount. For example, for human walking at 1.25 m/s, an artificially induced 5 ms lag of force relative to motion resulted in a 29% root-mean-square error of the ankle joint moment. The corresponding error in ankle joint power was 58%, and five times as much for walking at 2.2 m/s. The residual force, a measure of internal inconsistency in the data, increased by almost 1% body weight for each millisecond of mis-synchronization for walking. These sensitivities are relevant because standard experimental equipment usually synchronizes only the recording of data, but not processing latencies internal to equipment, which can and do cause mis-synchronization on the order of ten milliseconds. Biomechanical data should be synchronized to within a few milliseconds, and with respect to physical stimulus, to yield accurate inverse dynamics analysis.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Soft tissue deformations explain most of the mechanical work variations of human walking 96%
- Hindlimb kinematics, kinetics, and muscle dynamics during sit-to-stand and sit-to-walk transitions in emus (Dromaius novaehollandiae) 95%
- Habitual foot strike pattern does not affect simulated Triceps Surae muscle metabolic energy consumption during running 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The condition for dynamic stability in humans walking with feedback control 96%
- Similar sensorimotor transformations control balance during standing and walking 96%
- Predicting gait adaptations due to ankle plantarflexor muscle weakness and contracture using physics-based musculoskeletal simulations 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling toes contributes to realistic stance knee mechanics in three-dimensional predictive simulations of walking 96%
- AddBiomechanics: Automating model scaling, inverse kinematics, and inverse dynamics from human motion data through sequential optimization 95%
- Does joint impedance improve dynamic leg simulations with explicit and implicit solvers? 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.