Consortium Profile: The Methylation, Imaging and NeuroDevelopment (MIND) Consortium
Schuurmans, I. K.; Mulder, R. H.; Baltramonaityte, V.; Lahtinen, A.; Qiuyu, F.; Melo Rothmann, L.; Staginnus, M.; Tuulari, J.; Burt, S. A.; Buss, C.; Craig, J. M.; Donald, K. A.; Felix, J. F.; Freeman, T. P.; Oliveira, R. G.; Huels, A.; Hyde, L. W.; Jones, S. A.; Karlsson, H.; Karlsson, L.; Koen, N.; Lawn, W.; Mitchell, C.; Monk, C. S.; Mooney, M. A.; Muetzel, R.; Nigg, J. T.; Belangero, S.; Notterman, D.; O'Connor, T.; O'Donnell, K. J.; Pan, P.; Paunio, T.; Ryabinin, P.; Saffery, R.; Salum, G.; Seal, M.; Silk, T. J.; Stein, D. J.; Zar, H.; Walton, E.; Cecil, C. A. M.
Show abstract
Epigenetic processes, such as DNA methylation, show potential as biological markers and mechanisms underlying gene-environment interplay in the prediction of mental health and other brain-based phenotypes. However, little is known about how peripheral epigenetic patterns relate to individual differences in the brain itself. An increasingly popular approach to address this is by combining epigenetic and neuroimaging data; yet, research in this area is almost entirely comprised of cross-sectional studies in adults. To bridge this gap, we established the Methylation, Imaging and NeuroDevelopment (MIND) Consortium, which aims to bring a developmental focus to the emerging field of Neuroimaging Epigenetics by (i) promoting collaborative, adequately powered developmental research via multi-cohort analyses; (ii) increasing scientific rigor through the establishment of shared pipelines and open science practices; and (iii) advancing our understanding of DNA methylation-brain dynamics at different developmental periods (from birth to emerging adulthood), by leveraging data from prospective, longitudinal pediatric studies. MIND currently integrates 15 cohorts worldwide, comprising (repeated) measures of DNA methylation in peripheral tissues (blood, buccal cells, and saliva) and neuroimaging by magnetic resonance imaging across up to five time points over a period of up to 21 years (Npooled DNAm = 11,299; Npooled neuroimaging = 10,133; Npooled combined = 4,914). By triangulating associations across multiple developmental time points and study types, we hope to generate new insights into the dynamic relationships between peripheral DNA methylation and the brain, and how these ultimately relate to neurodevelopmental and psychiatric phenotypes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Missing data approaches for longitudinal neuroimaging research: Examples from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study 92%
- Assessing neurocognitive maturation in early adolescence based on baby and adult functional brain landscapes 92%
- A general exposome factor explains individual differences in functional brain network topography and cognition in youth 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Direct linkage detection with multimodal IVA fusion reveals markers of age, sex, cognition, and schizophrenia in large neuroimaging studies 92%
- Effects of gestational age at birth on perinatal structural brain development in healthy term-born babies 92%
- A comparison of intracranial volume estimation methods and their cross-sectional and longitudinal associations with age 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Meta-analysis of epigenome-wide associations between DNA methylation at birth and childhood cognitive skills. 92%
- Gene dosage effects of 22q11.2 copy number variants on in-vivo measures of white matter axonal density and dispersion 91%
- Intergenerational transmission of complex traits and the offspring methylome 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.