Back

Age- and sex- differences in efficacy of treatments for type 2 diabetes: Network meta-analysis of aggregate and individual level data

Hanlon, P.; Butterly, E.; Wei, L.; Wightman, H.; Almazam, S. A. M.; Alsallumi, K.; Crowther, J.; McChrystal, R.; Rennison, H.; Hughes, K.; Lewsey, J.; Lindsay, R.; McGurnaghan, S.; Petrie, J.; Tomlinson, L. A.; Wild, S.; Adler, A.; Sattar, N.; Phillippo, D.; Dias, S.; Welton, N.; McAllister, D. A.

2024-06-24 endocrinology
10.1101/2024.06.23.24309242 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceSodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor analogues (GLP1ra) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) improve hyperglycaemia and, in the case of SGLT2i and GLP1ra, reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in type 2 diabetes. It is not clear whether efficacy varies by age or sex. ObjectiveAssess whether age or sex are associated with differences in efficacy of SGL2i, GLP1ra and DPP4i. Data sourcesMedline, Embase and clinical trial registries. Study selectionTwo independent reviewers screened for randomised controlled trials of SGLT2i/GLP1ra/DPP4i, compared to placebo/active comparator, in adults with type 2 diabetes. Data extraction and synthesisWe sought individual participant data (IPD) all eligible studies. Where IPD were available, we modelled age- and sex-treatment interactions for each trial. Otherwise, we assessed age- sex distributions along with results from aggregate trial data. IPD and aggregate findings were combined in a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Main outcome measuresHbA1c and MACE. ResultsWe identified 616 eligible trials (604 reporting HbA1c, 23 reporting MACE) and obtained IPD for 75 trials (6 reporting MACE). Mean age was 59.0 (10.7) years and 64.0 (8.6) in HbA1c and MACE trials, respectively. Proportions of female were 43.1% and 44.0% in HbA1c and MACE trials, respectively. SGLT2i reduced HbA1c by 0.5-1.0% overall compared to placebo. This reduction versus placebo was attenuated in older participants (change in HbA1c 0.25 percentage-points less for 75-year-olds compared to 45-year-olds). SGLT2i showed greater relative efficacy in MACE risk reduction among older than younger people. This finding was sensitive to the exclusion of one of the IPD MACE trials, however, in all sensitivity analyses, SGLT2i were either as efficacious or more efficacious in older participants. There was no consistently significant difference in efficacy by age for GLP1ra or DPP4i for HbA1c or MACE, nor were there consistent significant sex differences for any class. ConclusionNewer glucose-lowering drugs are efficacious across age and sex groups. SGLT2i are more cardioprotective in older than younger people despite smaller HbA1c reductions. Age alone should not be a barrier to treatments with proven cardiovascular benefit providing they are well tolerated align with patient priorities.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
4
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
10
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
12
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
14
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
25
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Diabetes
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%