Back

A database of digital line drawings that depict expected and unexpected action-place relationships

Tezcan Aydemir, S.; Tezcan Umul, S.; Urgen, B. A.

2024-06-28 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.06.22.600189 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In the present study, we introduce an image database created with a simple digital line-drawing tool to represent the expected and unexpected action-place relationships. This database consists of 70 drawings. We validated the dataset with 207 participants. They evaluated the actions, places, and the probability of an action taking place in the respective location. The comprehensibility of each drawing was evaluated using three measures: H-statistics (entropy), which is a measure of the uncertainty of the definition; the definition similarity percentages which is a measure of the naming agreement that is consistent among participants; and the mean probability of the depicted action taking place in the depicted location. Each drawing includes different agents and environments, providing researchers with the opportunity to use this dataset in various fields of cognitive neuroscience, including visual recognition, memory, predictive coding, and novelty detection.

Published in Vision Research (predicted rank #6) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Psychology
○ 56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.8%
Similar papers in this journal
2
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.2%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Behavior Research Methods
○ 30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.9%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Consciousness and Cognition
○ 19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
Similar papers in this journal
Vision Research · published here
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Cognition
○ 47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
8
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
○ 77 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
9
Psychological Science
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
European Journal of Neuroscience
○ 189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Cortex
○ 119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Psychiatry
○ 87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
14
Journal of Vision
● 110 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
15
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
16
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
● 23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
● 13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
18
Neuropsychologia
○ 85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Neuroscience of Consciousness
◐ 16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
21
eneuro
● 439 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.