Point set registration for combining fluorescence microscopy methods
Severins, I.; Joo, C.; van Noort, J.
10.1101/2024.06.22.600172 bioRxivShow abstract
SUMMARYImplementation of combined microscopy methods provides valuable information across various scientific applications. However, aligning the datasets and finding the correct point correspondence poses a challenge, especially for large, randomly distributed point sets that are subject to positional errors and missing points. Here, we provide a three-step procedure to perform point set registration, which can be applied to datasets with millions of points and stays robust even when only 10% of the points correspond. In the first global step, the scaling and rotation parameters for the imaging systems are determined once on a smaller calibration dataset using a geometric hashing algorithm. When the global transformation is known, full experimental datasets can be registered by performing step two: a course registration using cross-correlation, and step three: a precise registration to fine-tune the transformation. After these three steps, point correspondence is determined by setting a distance threshold based on a statistical model of random point sets that additionally provides the matching error. We have demonstrated its successful implementation in coupling fluorescence and sequencing methodologies. To enable wide application of these point set registration and correspondence algorithms we provide a python library called MatchPoint.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MetaChrome: An Open-Source, User-Friendly Tool for Automated Metaphase Chromosome Analysis 93%
- Analyzing engineered point spread functions using phasor-based single-molecule localization microscopy 92%
- Mapping the 3D genome through high speed single-molecule tracking of functional transcription factors in single living cells 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.