Back

Mammographic density assessed using deep learning in women at high risk of developing breast cancer: the effect of weight change on density

Squires, S.; Harvie, M.; Howell, A.; Evans, D. G.; Astley, S. M.

2024-06-23 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2024.06.22.24309234 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesHigh mammographic density (MD) and excess weight are associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Weight loss interventions could reduce risk, but classically defined percentage density measures may not reflect this due to disproportionate loss of breast fat. We investigate an artificial intelligence-based density method, reporting density changes in 46 women enrolled in a weight-loss study in a family history breast cancer clinic, using a volumetric density method as a comparison. MethodsWe analysed data from women who had weight recorded and mammograms taken at the start and end of the 12-month weight intervention study. MD was assessed at both time points using a deep learning model, pVAS, trained on expert estimates of percent density, and Volpara density software. ResultsThe Spearman rank correlation between reduction in weight and change in density was 0.17 (-0.13 to 0.43) for pVAS and 0.59 (0.36 to 0.75) for Volpara volumetric percent density. ConclusionspVAS percent density measurements were not significantly affected by change in weight. Percent density measured with Volpara increased as weight decreased, driven by changes in fat volume. Advances in knowledgeThe effect of weight change on pVAS mammographic density predictions has not previously been published.

Published in Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.5%
2
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
3
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
4
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.4%
6
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
7
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
8
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
9
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
10
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
11
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
13
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
15
Placenta
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Obesity
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
23
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
JBMR Plus
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
25
International Journal of Obesity
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%