Weather and leaf age separately contribute to temporal shifts in phyllosphere community structure and composition
Heil, J. A.; Simler-Williamson, A.; Striluk, M. L.; Trawick, D.; Capezza, R.; Osorio, A.; Finney, B.; DeFehr, C.; Turner, K. G.; Bittleston, L. S.
Show abstract
Microbial communities living on plant leaves can positively or negatively influence plant health and, by extension, can impact whole ecosystems. Most research into the leaf microbiome consists of snapshots, and little is known about how microbial communities change over time. Weather and host physiological characteristics change over time and are often collinear with other time-varying factors, such as substrate availability, making it difficult to separate the factors driving microbial community change. We leveraged repeated measures over the course of an entire year to isolate the relative importance of environmental, host physiological, and substrate age-related factors on the assembly, structure, and composition of leaf-associated fungal communities. We applied both culturing and sequencing approaches to investigate these communities, focusing on a foundational, widely-distributed plant of conservation concern: basin big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata subsp. tridentata). We found that changes in alpha diversity were independently affected by the age of a community and the air temperature. Surprisingly, total fungal abundance and species richness were not positively correlated and responded differently, sometimes oppositely, to weather. With regard to beta diversity, communities were more similar to each other across similar leaf ages, air temperatures, leaf types, and {delta}13C stable isotope ratios. Nine different genera were differentially abundant with air temperature, {delta}13C, leaf type, and leaf age, and a set of 20 genera were continuously present across the year. Our findings highlight the necessity for longer-term, repeated sampling to parse drivers of temporal change in leaf microbial communities. Open Research StatementAll ITS DNA amplicon sequence raw data are deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA), BioProject number PRJNA1107252, data will be released upon publication. All community data, metadata, taxonomic data, and R code necessary to reproduce these results are deposited in the GitHub repository archived on Zenodo: 10.5281/zenodo.11106439.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fungal communities living within leaves of native Hawaiian dicots are structured by landscape-scale variables as well as by host plants 96%
- Mega-fire in Redwood Tanoak Forest Reduces Bacterial and Fungal Richness and Selects for Pyrophilous Taxa and Traits that are Phylogenetically Conserved 96%
- Different factors drive community assembly of rare and common ectomycorrhizal fungi 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Plant neighbors differentially alter a focal species' biotic interactions through changes to resource allocation 94%
- Metabolic insight into bacterial community assembly across ecosystem boundaries 94%
- Plant interaction traits determine the biomass of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria in soil 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Resistance and resilience of soil microbiomes under climate change 96%
- Soil microbial communities are not altered by garlic mustard in recently invaded central Illinois forests 95%
- Microbial functional guilds and genes are key to explaining soil nutrient cycling alongside soil and plant variables 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Aspen-associated soil microbiomes reveal different strategies for nitrogen acquisition across ecosystems in Mexico and Canada 96%
- Ericoid mycorrhizal diversity increases with soil age and progressive phosphorus limitation across a 4.1 million-year chronosequence 96%
- Divergent assembly trajectories: a comparison of the plant and soil microbiome with plant communities in a glacier forefield 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.