Back

Oral Hygiene Practices and Their Impact on Oral Health Among the Indigenes of Akpugo Community in Enugu State, Nigeria

Yaqub, M.; Nnamani, C. P.

2024-06-21 dentistry and oral medicine
10.1101/2024.06.21.24309281 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the oral hygiene practices and their effectiveness in preventing common oral diseases among the residents of the Akpugo community in Enugu State, Nigeria. MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 150 randomly selected participants from the five villages of Akpugo. Data collection involved personal interviews and physical examinations of oral cavities using sterilized instruments. The analysis included percentage calculations, z-tests, and the categorization of participants by socio-economic groups based on age and gender. ResultsThe study revealed a high prevalence of oral diseases, with 29.3% of participants having dental caries, 19.3% suffering from halitosis, 18% diagnosed with gingivitis, and 10% with periodontitis. Most participants (90.7%) brushed their teeth once daily, predominantly in the morning, and only 5.3% brushed twice daily. A majority used toothbrushes and toothpaste (58%), while a significant portion still relied on traditional methods such as chewing sticks (26.67%). The presence of dental calculus was observed in 47.3% of participants, with dental plaque noted in 16.7%. ConclusionThe findings highlight a significant prevalence of poor oral health despite varying levels of awareness regarding preventive practices. The study underscores the need for targeted interventions, including comprehensive oral health education programs, the establishment of dental centers, and community-led initiatives to improve oral hygiene practices. These measures are crucial for reducing the incidence of oral diseases and enhancing the overall health and well-being of the Akpugo community. The study emphasizes the importance of continuous education and intervention to promote optimal oral health in rural areas.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.