Back

The chemical chaperone 4-phenylbutyric acid rescues molecular cell defects of COL3A1 mutations that cause vascular Ehlers Danlos Syndrome

Omar, R.; Lee, M.; Gonzalez-Trueba, L.; Lianos, S.; Hazarika, S.; Ammar, M. A.; Cassels, J.; Michie, A. M.; Bulleid, N. J.; Malfait, F.; Van Agtmael, T.

2024-06-24 genetics
10.1101/2024.06.20.599980 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeVascular Ehlers Danlos Syndrome (vEDS) is a connective tissue disorder caused by COL3A1 mutations for which there are no treatments due to a limited understanding of underlying mechanisms. We aimed to address this critical knowledge gap, focusing on collagen folding, to establish if targeting protein folding represents a potential therapeutic approach. MethodsWe performed a mechanistic analysis of two novel COL3A1 glycine mutations, G189S and G906R, using primary patient fibroblast cultures, and performed pre-clinical proof-of-concept treatments using FDA-approved chemical chaperones targeting protein folding and/or degradation. ResultsCOL3A1 mutations caused secretion of misfolded collagen III and intracellular collagen retention, leading to matrix defects and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, with increased severity for the more C-terminal mutation. Promoting ER protein folding capacity through the chemical chaperone 4-phenylbutyric acid rescued the ER stress, thermostability of secreted collagen, matrix defects and apoptosis. Optimising treatment duration and dosage helped overcome allele-dependent treatment efficacy. In contrast, protein degradation alone or combined with targeting protein folding did not increase efficacy. ConclusionER stress is a molecular mechanism in vEDS that can be influenced by the position of COL3A1 mutation, and promoting protein folding is a putative mechanism-based therapeutic approach that can rescue intra- and extracellular defects.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.