A magnitude-independent neural code for linguistic information during sentence production
Morgan, A. M.; Devinsky, O.; Doyle, W.; Dugan, P.; Friedman, D.; Flinker, A.
Show abstract
AbstractHumans are the only species with the ability to systematically combine words to convey an unbounded number of complex meanings. This process is guided by combinatorial processes thought to be unique to our species. Despite their centrality to human cognition, the neural mechanisms underlying these systems remain obscured by inherent limitations of non-invasive brain measures and a near total focus on comprehension paradigms. Here, we address these limitations with high-resolution neurosurgical recordings (electrocorticography) and a controlled sentence production experiment. We uncover distinct cortical networks encoding word-level and higher-order information. These networks exhibited a hybrid spatial organization: broadly distributed across traditional language areas, but with focal concentrations of sensitivity to semantic and structural contrasts in canonical language regions. In contrast to previous findings from comprehension studies, we find that these networks are largely non-overlapping, each processing information associated with one of three linguistic contrasts. Most strikingly, our data reveal an unexpected property of higher-order linguistic information: it is encoded independent of neural activity levels. These results show that activity magnitude and information content are dissociable, with important implications for studying the neurobiology of language.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatiotemporal dynamics of successive activations across the human brain during simple arithmetic processing 95%
- Predictive feedback, early sensory representations and fast responses to predicted stimuli depend on NMDA receptors 95%
- Dimensionality and ramping: Signatures of sentence integration in the dynamics of brains and deep language models 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.