Optimized genome-wide CRISPR screening enables rapid engineering of growth-based phenotypes in Yarrowia lipolytica
Robertson, N. R.; Trivedi, V.; Lupish, B.; Ramesh, A.; Aguilar, Y.; Arteaga, A.; Nguyen, A.; Lee, S.; Lenert-Mondou, C.; Harland-Dunaway, M.; Jinkerson, R.; Wheeldon, I.
Show abstract
CRISPR-Cas9 functional genomic screens uncover gene targets linked to various phenotypes for metabolic engineering with remarkable efficiency. However, these genome-wide screens face a number of design challenges, including variable guide RNA activity, ensuring sufficient genome coverage, and maintaining high transformation efficiencies to ensure full library representation. These challenges are prevalent in non-conventional yeast, many of which exhibit traits that are well suited to metabolic engineering and bioprocessing. To address these hurdles in the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica, we designed a compact, high-activity genome-wide sgRNA library. The library was designed using DeepGuide, a sgRNA activity prediction algorithm, and a large dataset of [~]50,000 sgRNAs with known activity. Three guides per gene enables redundant targeting of 98.8% of genes in the genome in a library of 23,900 sgRNAs. We deployed the optimized library to uncover genes essential to the tolerance of acetate, a promising alternative carbon source, and various hydrocarbons present in many waste streams. Our screens yielded several gene knockouts that improve acetate tolerance on their own and as double knockouts in media containing acetate as the sole carbon source. Analysis of the hydrocarbon screens revealed genes related to fatty acid and alkane metabolism in Y. lipolytica. The optimized CRISPR gRNA library and its successful use in Y. lipolytica led to the discovery of alternative carbon source-related genes and provides a workflow for creating high-activity, compact genome-wide libraries for strain engineering. HighlightsO_LIDesigned a compact, high activity CRISPR sgRNA knockout library for Yarrowia lipolytica. C_LIO_LIDeveloped an efficient pipeline for discovering genes involved in alternative carbon-source utilization. C_LIO_LIIdentified single and double gene knockouts that improve growth on acetate. C_LIO_LIIdentified genes with improved fitness and essentiality for hydrocarbon growth. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Tri-Functional CRISPR Screen Reveals Overexpression of QDR2 and QDR3 Transporters Increase Fumaric Acid Production in Kluyveromyces marxianus 98%
- A broad-host-range CRISPRi toolkit for silencing gene expression in Burkholderia 96%
- L-SCRaMbLE creates large-scale genome rearrangements in synthetic Sc2.0 chromosomes 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- CRISPR-Cas12a/Cpf1-assisted precise, efficient and multiplexed genome-editing in Yarrowia lipolytica 96%
- Optimizing a High Performing Multiplex-CRISPRi P. putida strain with Integrated Metabolomics and 13C-Metabolic Flux Analyses 95%
- Fine modulation of carbon flow in the central carbon metabolism via ribosome-binding site modification in Escherichia coli 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scalable, methanol-free manufacturing of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain in engineered Komagataella phaffii 94%
- Improved, scalable, two-stage, autoinduction of recombinant protein expression in E. coli utilizing phosphate depletion. 93%
- Eliminating Genes for a Two Component System Increases PHB Productivity in Cupriavidus basilensis 4G11 Under PHB Suppressing, Non-Stress Conditions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- CRISpy-pop: a web tool for designing CRISPR/Cas9-driven genetic modifications in diverse populations 96%
- Near 100% efficient homology-dependent genome engineering in the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans 95%
- Highly replicated experiments studying complex genotypes using nested DNA barcodes. 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.