Back

Chemically induced cell plasticity enables the generation of high-fidelity embryo model

Silva, J. C. R.; Li, H.; Huang, J.; Guan, W.; Wu, J.; Luo, H.; Chang, L.; Zhao, H.; Chen, C.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, J.

2024-06-20 cell biology
10.1101/2024.06.20.598030 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Embryo models open exciting opportunities for improving our understanding of development and advancing medicine. However, current models depend on intricate procedures and the integration of separately generated cell types. Here, we aimed to establish a chemical-only strategy to induce cellular plasticity and generate embryo founder-like cells. Within 60 hours, chemical-induced pluripotent stem cells activated early lineage specifiers, Cdx2 and Gata6, while maintaining Oct4/ Pou5f1 expression. Following a second 36-hour chemical treatment, founder-like cells developed into all blastocyst fates and self-assembled into embryo-like structures. These progressed into high-fidelity late-streak gastrulation stages within 4.5 days, displaying primitive streak formation via epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, along with germ-layer tissues, amnion, and ectoplacental cone. Fate trajectories and molecular signatures from founder-like cells to chemically-induced embryo model (ci-MO) were defined, revealing remarkable similarity up to Embryonic day (E) 7.5 embryo. Summarily, ci-MO offers a straightforward, rapid, small-molecule-only, and high-fidelity approach to study embryonic development and cell fate specification. HighlightsO_LIGeneration of a direct, efficient, and sophisticated chemically induced embryo model (ci-MO) C_LIO_LITwo-pulse chemical induction reprograms ESCs into founder-like cells capable of developing all embryo fates C_LIO_LIGastrulating ci-MOs display high morphological and molecular accuracy C_LIO_LIci-MOs reconstruct embryo developmental trajectories C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.