Shared genetic architecture and causal pathways between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and restless legs syndrome
Li, F.-J.; Li, J.-Y.; Zhang, R.-Y.; Liu, X.-J.; Lv, B.-C.; Zhang, T.; Liu, Y.-N.; Zhang, Z.-X.; Zhang, W.; Cui, G.-Y.; Xu, C.-Y.
Show abstract
Previous studies have revealed a significant overlap between ADHD and RLS populations, with shared pathological mechanisms such as dopaminergic function and iron metabolism deficits. However, the genetic mechanisms underlying these connections remain unclear. In our study, we conducted a genome-wide genetic correlation analysis to confirm a shared genetic structure between ADHD and RLS. We identified five pleiotropic loci through PLACO analysis, with colocalization analysis revealing a shared causal genetic variant, rs12336113, located in an intron of the PTPRD gene within one of these loci. Additionally, we identified 14 potential shared genes and biological pathways between these diseases. Protein-protein interaction analysis demonstrated close interactions among six genes: PTPRD, MEIS1, MAP2K5, SKOR1, BTBD9, and TOX3. We further investigated gene-driven causal pathways using univariable Mendelian randomization (MR), multivariable MR, and Network MR analyses. Our findings indicate that ADHD may indirectly promote the onset of RLS by advancing the age of first birth, while RLS could indirectly contribute to ADHD by reducing fractional anisotropy in body of corpus callosum. Notably, an increase in radial diffusivity, rather than a decrease in axial diffusivity, played a crucial role in this process. In conclusion, our research supports a close genetic link between ADHD and RLS, identifying PTPRD as the most likely pleiotropic gene between these conditions. Moreover, ADHD may indirectly promote RLS onset by advancing the age of first birth, while RLS may indirectly promote ADHD onset by causing demyelination in body of corpus callosum.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunological Drivers and Potential Novel Drug Targets for Major Psychiatric, Neurodevelopmental, and Neurodegenerative Conditions 95%
- Genetic neurodevelopmental clustering and dyslexia 95%
- Comprehensive analyses of RNA-seq and genome-wide data point to enrichment of neuronal cell type subsets in neuropsychiatric disorders 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- DNA Methylation as a Potential Mediator of the Association Between Prenatal Tobacco and Alcohol Exposure and Child Neurodevelopment in a South African Birth Cohort 94%
- Genomic Influences on Self-Reported Childhood Maltreatment 94%
- Are psychiatric disorders risk factors for COVID-19 susceptibility and severity? a two-sample, bidirectional, univariable and multivariable Mendelian Randomization study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- GWAS of Over 427,000 Individuals Establishes GABAergic and Synaptic Molecular Pathways as Key for Cognitive Executive Functions 95%
- Shared and distinct genetic influences between cognitive domains and psychiatric disorder risk based on genome-wide data 94%
- Sex-Dependent Shared and Non-Shared Genetic Architecture Across Mood and Psychotic Disorders 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining Differences in the Genetic and Functional Architecture of ADHD Diagnosed in Childhood and Adulthood 94%
- Genome-wide by environment interaction study of stressful life events and hospital-treated depression in the iPSYCH2012 sample 93%
- Model-based EEG phenotyping uncovers distinct neurocomputational mechanisms underlying learning impairments across psychopathologies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dissecting causal relationships between cortical morphology and neuropsychiatric disorders: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study 95%
- The overlapping genetic architecture of psychiatric disorders and cortical brain structure 94%
- Neuroimaging Insights into Brain Mechanisms of Early-onset Restrictive Eating Disorders 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.