Back

Minimizing biological risk for novel inhibitory drug targets: One knockout is all you need

Dimitriev, A.; Postovit, L.-M.; Simpson, A. L.; Wong, G. K.-S.

2024-06-20 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.06.19.24309116
Show abstract

We argue that biological risk for novel inhibitory drug targets can be minimized, almost eliminated, by a computational analysis of the healthcare records and DNA sequences in resources like UK Biobank or All-of-Us. The key insight is that an inhibitory drug is functionally equivalent to a loss-of-function (LOF) variant in the targeted gene. It is a special case of what has been called an "experiment of nature". To demonstrate, we considered all available clinical trials (58 in total) and inhibitory drugs (15 in total) for 5 cardiovascular drug targets: PCSK9, APOC3, ANGPTL3, LPA, and ASGR1. The results were shocking. Every biomarker assessed in these clinical trials was successfully predicted, i.e. directionality and proportionality of effect, but not the magnitude since that varies with dosage. This concept has not been widely adopted because geneticists believe that homozygous LOFs, which are exceedingly rare, would be needed to observe a significant phenotypic effect from most genetic knockouts. Our study shows that, to the contrary, given a sufficiently large biobank, counting both carriers and non-carriers, heterozygous LOFs alone can inform drug development.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 13%
11.1%
2
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 11%
7.5%
3
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 3%
5.0%
4
Genetics in Medicine
based on 57 papers
Top 2%
4.6%
5
European Journal of Human Genetics
based on 25 papers
Top 0.3%
4.6%
6
PLOS Genetics
based on 39 papers
Top 0.6%
4.4%
7
Human Genomics
based on 13 papers
Top 0.1%
2.9%
8
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 80%
2.8%
9
Genome Medicine
based on 56 papers
Top 3%
2.8%
10
Cell Genomics
based on 34 papers
Top 0.9%
2.8%
11
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
based on 30 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
12
Journal of Medical Genetics
based on 22 papers
Top 0.6%
2.4%
13
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 13%
2.3%
14
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Nature Genetics
based on 72 papers
Top 7%
1.3%
16
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 7%
1.3%
17
Journal of Personalized Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Human Molecular Genetics
based on 28 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 13%
1.2%
20
Circulation
based on 37 papers
Top 5%
1.2%
21
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
based on 39 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Genes
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 15%
0.8%
25
Human Genetics
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Human Mutation
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Nature Human Behaviour
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 15%
0.7%