The transcriptomic and spatial organization of telencephalic GABAergic neuronal types
van Velthoven, C. T. J.; Gao, Y.; Kunst, M.; Lee, C.; McMillen, D.; Chakka, A. B.; Casper, T.; Clark, M.; Chakrabarty, R.; Daniel, S.; Dolbeare, T.; Ferrer, R.; Gloe, J.; Goldy, J.; Guzman, J.; Halterman, C.; Ho, W.; Huang, M.; James, K.; McCue, R.; Nguy, B.; Pham, T.; Ronellenfitch, K.; Thomas, E. D.; Torkelson, A.; Pagan, C.; Kruse, L.; Dee, N.; Ng, L.; Waters, J.; Smith, K. A.; Tasic, B.; Yao, Z.; Zeng, H.
Show abstract
The telencephalon of the mammalian brain comprises multiple regions and circuit pathways that play adaptive and integrative roles in a variety of brain functions. There is a wide array of GABAergic neurons in the telencephalon; they play a multitude of circuit functions, and dysfunction of these neurons has been implicated in diverse brain disorders. In this study, we conducted a systematic and in-depth analysis of the transcriptomic and spatial organization of GABAergic neuronal types in all regions of the mouse telencephalon and their developmental origins. This was accomplished by utilizing 611,423 single-cell transcriptomes from the comprehensive and high-resolution transcriptomic and spatial cell type atlas for the adult whole mouse brain we have generated, supplemented with an additional single-cell RNA-sequencing dataset containing 99,438 high-quality single-cell transcriptomes collected from the pre- and postnatal developing mouse brain. We present a hierarchically organized adult telencephalic GABAergic neuronal cell type taxonomy of 7 classes, 52 subclasses, 284 supertypes, and 1,051 clusters, as well as a corresponding developmental taxonomy of 450 clusters across different ages. Detailed charting efforts reveal extraordinary complexity where relationships among cell types reflect both spatial locations and developmental origins. Transcriptomically and developmentally related cell types can often be found in distant and diverse brain regions indicating that long-distance migration and dispersion is a common characteristic of nearly all classes of telencephalic GABAergic neurons. Additionally, we find various spatial dimensions of both discrete and continuous variations among related cell types that are correlated with gene expression gradients. Lastly, we find that cortical, striatal and some pallidal GABAergic neurons undergo extensive postnatal diversification, whereas septal and most pallidal GABAergic neuronal types emerge simultaneously during the embryonic stage with limited postnatal diversification. Overall, the telencephalic GABAergic cell type taxonomy can serve as a foundational reference for molecular, structural and functional studies of cell types and circuits by the entire community.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A new transcriptional metastatic signature predicts survival in clear cell renal cell carcinoma 98%
- An epigenome atlas of neural progenitors within the embryonic mouse forebrain 98%
- Allele-resolved single-cell multi-omics uncovers the dynamics and transcriptional kinetics of X-chromosome upregulation 98%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Potentiation of active locomotor state by spinal-projecting serotonergic neurons 98%
- Ventral frontostriatal circuitry mediates the computation of reinforcement from symbolic gains and losses 97%
- A cortical circuit mechanism for coding and updating task structural knowledge in inference-based decision-making 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- linc-mipep and linc-wrb encode micropeptides that regulate chromatin accessibility in vertebrate-specific neural cells 98%
- Spen links RNA-mediated endogenous retrovirus silencing and X chromosome inactivation 98%
- Slowly evolving dopaminergic activity modulates the moment-to-moment probability of movement initiation. 98%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.