Back

The N-glycosylation defect in Lec5 and Lec9 CHO cells is caused by absence of the DHRSX gene

Kentache, T.; Althoff, C. R.; Caligiore, F.; Souche, E.; Schulz, C.; Graff, J.; Pieters, E.; Stanley, P.; Contessa, J.; Van Schaftingen, E.; Matthijs, G.; Foulquier, F.; Bommer, G. T.; Wilson, M. P.

2024-06-18 biochemistry
10.1101/2024.06.18.599300 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glycosylation-deficient Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines have been instrumental in the discovery of N-glycosylation machinery. Yet, the molecular causes of the glycosylation defects in the Lec5 and Lec9 mutants have been elusive, even though for both cell lines a defect in dolichol formation from polyprenol was previously established. We recently found that dolichol synthesis from polyprenol occurs in three steps consisting of the conversion of polyprenol to polyprenal by DHRSX, the reduction of polyprenal to dolichal by SRD5A3 and the reduction of dolichal to dolichol, again by DHRSX. This led us to investigate defective dolichol synthesis in Lec5 and Lec9 cells. Both cell lines showed increased levels of polyprenol and its derivatives, concomitant with decreased levels of dolichol and derivatives, but no change in polyprenal levels, suggesting DHRSX deficiency. Accordingly, N-glycan synthesis and changes in polyisoprenoid levels were corrected by complementation with human DHRSX but not with SRD5A3. Furthermore, the typical polyprenol dehydrogenase and dolichal reductase activities of DHRSX were absent in membrane preparations derived from Lec5 and Lec9 cells, while the reduction of polyprenal to dolichal, catalyzed by SRD5A3, was unaffected. Long-read whole genome sequencing of Lec5 and Lec9 cells did not reveal mutations in the ORF of SRD5A3, but the genomic region containing DHRSX was absent. Lastly, we established the sequence of Chinese hamster DHRSX and validated that this protein has similar kinetic properties to the human enzyme. Our work therefore identifies the basis of the dolichol synthesis defect in CHO Lec5 and Lec9 cells.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 2%
16.9%
3
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.7%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.5%
6
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
7
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
8
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
9
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
10
Journal of Lipid Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
13
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
15
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
19
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
21
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Glycobiology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
23
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
24
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
26
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
27
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%