Back

The DNA Replication Checkpoint Targets the Kinetochore for Relocation of Collapsed Forks to the Nuclear Periphery

Maclay, T. M.; Whalen, J.; Johnson, M.; Freudenreich, C. H.

2024-07-04 cell biology
10.1101/2024.06.17.599319 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hairpin forming expanded CAG/CTG repeats pose significant challenges to DNA replication which can lead to replication fork collapse. Long CAG/CTG repeat tracts relocate to the nuclear pore complex to maintain their integrity. Forks impeded by DNA structures are known to activate the DNA damage checkpoint, thus we asked whether checkpoint proteins play a role in relocation of collapsed forks to the nuclear periphery in S. cerevisiae. We show that relocation of a (CAG/CTG)130 tract is dependent on activation of the Mrc1/Rad53 replication checkpoint. Further, checkpoint-mediated phosphorylation of the kinetochore protein Cep3 is required for relocation, implicating detachment of the centromere from the spindle pole body. Activation of this pathway leads to DNA damage-induced microtubule recruitment to the repeat. These data suggest a role for the DNA replication checkpoint in facilitating movement of collapsed replication forks to the nuclear periphery by centromere release and microtubule-directed motion. HighlightsO_LIThe DNA replication checkpoint initiates relocation of a structure-forming CAG repeat tract to the nuclear pore complex (NPC) C_LIO_LIThe importance of Mrc1 (hClaspin) implicates fork uncoupling as the initial checkpoint signal C_LIO_LIPhosphorylation of the Cep3 kinetochore protein by Dun1 kinase allows for centromere release, which is critical for collapsed fork repositioning C_LIO_LIDamage-inducible nuclear microtubules (DIMs) colocalize with the repeat locus and are required for relocation to the NPC C_LIO_LIEstablishes a new role for the DNA replication and DNA damage checkpoint response to trigger repositioning of collapsed forks within the nucleus. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.