Back

Prevalence of errors in lab-made plasmids across the globe

Bai, X.; Hong, J. F.; Yu, S.; Hu, D. Y.; Chen, A. Y.; Rich, C. A.; Shi, S. J.; Xu, S. Y.; Croucher, D. M.; Mussar, K. J.; Meng, D. W.; Chen, J. L.; Lahn, B. T.

2024-08-04 molecular biology
10.1101/2024.06.17.596931 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plasmids are indispensable in life sciences research and therapeutics development. Currently, most labs custom-build their plasmids. As yet, no systematic data on the quality of lab-made plasmids exist. Here, we report a broad survey of plasmids from hundreds of academic and industrial labs worldwide. We show that nearly half of them contained design and/or sequence errors. For transfer plasmids used in making AAV vectors, which are widely used in gene therapy, about 40% carried mutations in the inverted terminal repeat (ITR) regions due to their inherent instability, which is influenced by flanking GC content. We also list genes difficult to clone into plasmid or package into virus due to their toxicity. Our finding raises serious concerns over the trustworthiness of lab-made plasmids, which parallels the underappreciated mycoplasma contamination and misidentified mammalian cell lines reported previously, and highlights the need for community-wide standards to uphold the quality of this ubiquitous reagent in research and medicine. Accordingly, we propose the concept of good vector practice (GVP) that covers the proper design, construction, in-process QC, final QC, banking and management of plasmids in research and medicine to uphold their quality.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.3%
3
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
5
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.5%
8
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
10
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
11
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
12
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
13
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
16
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
18
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
20
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%
24
Molecular Therapy Methods & Clinical Development
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
25
BMC Biotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
26
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
28
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
30
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%