Back

New mitochondrial gene order arrangements and evolutionary implications in the subclass Octocorallia

Poliseno, A.; Quattrini, A. M.; Lau, Y. W.; Pirro, S.; Reimer, J. D.; McFadden, C. S.

2024-06-17 genomics
10.1101/2024.06.15.599068 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The complete mitochondrial genomes of octocorals typically range from 18.5 kb to 20.5 kb in length, and include 14 protein coding genes (PCGs), two ribosomal RNA genes and one tRNA. To date seven different gene orders (A-G) have been described, yet comprehensive investigations of the actual number of arrangements, as well as comparative analyses and evolutionary reconstructions of mitochondrial genome evolution within the whole subclass Octocorallia have been often overlooked. Here we considered the complete mitochondrial genomes available for octocorals and explored their structure and gene order variability. Our results updated the actual number of mitochondrial gene order arrangements so far known for octocorals from seven to twelve, and allowed us to explore and preliminarily discuss the role of some of the structural and functional factors in the mitogenomes. We performed comparative mitogenomic analyses on the existing and novel octocoral gene orders, considering different mitogenomic structural features such as genome size, GC percentage, AT- and GC-skewness. The mitochondrial gene order history mapped on a recently published nuclear loci phylogeny showed that the most common rearrangement events in octocorals are inversions, and that the mitochondrial genome evolution in the subclass is discontinuous, with rearranged gene orders restricted only to some regions of the tree. We believe that different rearrangement events arose independently and most likely that new gene orders, instead of being derived from other rearranged orders, came from the ancestral and most common gene order. Finally, our data demonstrate how the study of mitochondrial gene orders can be used to explore the evolution of octocorals and in some cases can be used to assess the phylogenetic placement of certain taxa.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
2
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
3
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
5
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
6
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
9
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
13
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
DNA Research
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
15
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
21
Mitochondrion
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
22
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.9%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
27
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%